From RAWK....
meh. It’s barely a competition at this point. It’s disheartening reading this thread. We’re already used to Man City doing dodgy deals and cooking the books. This transfer is being hailed across the media, so far. It’s almost like Man City is a household name now.
This made me laugh!
Funny that nobody said a word when Liverpool was winning titles in the 1970s/80s was that not bad for football ?
If they had our owners it would be the best thing since sliced bread ? Plus without their backing football would be dead and players would not want to come and play in England
Scouse poetry (with added grammatical errors)What the fuck is that Jibberish on the left above the Pic.
Not at the very least. At the very most.Advance apologies, I'm crap at maths. As I understand it:
- City and Liverpool both have 86 points. City are ahead on goal difference.
- Liverpool win their next two games, they end up with 92 points. City need to get more than that to win the league.
- City win all three upcoming games = City have 95 points = City win the league.
- City win two upcoming games and draw one = City have 93 points = City win the league.
- City lose one upcoming game and win two = City have 92 points = City possibly win the league if your goal difference is higher.
So in other words, City need to win two games and draw one AT THE VERY LEAST.
Advance apologies, I'm crap at maths. As I understand it:
- City and Liverpool both have 86 points. City are ahead on goal difference.
- Liverpool win their next two games, they end up with 92 points. City need to get more than that to win the league.
- City win all three upcoming games = City have 95 points = City win the league.
- City win two upcoming games and draw one = City have 93 points = City win the league.
- City lose one upcoming game and win two = City have 92 points = City possibly win the league if your goal difference is higher.
So in other words, City need to win two games and draw one AT THE VERY LEAST.