oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Nnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy I`m not having that.That’s why it was to be held there—they got the breeder’s discount.
Nnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy I`m not having that.That’s why it was to be held there—they got the breeder’s discount.
No worries, they cancelled it in the end, as none of the Liverpool supporters were willing to hoof it to Merseyside…Nnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy I`m not having that.
You can see the next headlines "Poor fans sue Racecourse for Stress after Cancellation of ..."Ha the old chestnut “unforeseen circumstances “ aka couldn’t shift the tickets.
Can you get a refund if you intended to jib in ?
Not livarpool fans, you say? :OThe so-called "fans" sending threats to Darwin Nunez are NOT Liverpool fans. My husband is absolutely and utterly disgusted to hear about this and we have many friends who are also Liverpool fans who agree. Any person who abuses a player and threatens their family like that are not football fans, they are fucking scumbag trolls.
If they go the games, the club should give them a permanent ban.
It has all the hallmarks of Parisian Chelsea supporting skinheads working on an SAS operation.Not livarpool fans, you say? :O
Belgian skinheads? Chelsea fans? Parisian youths? The SAS?
Please do tell me, who are those who are abusing Nunez, as it surely can't be livarpool fans' fault, can it? ;)
Funded by Abu Dhabi oil money!It has all the hallmarks of Parisian Chelsea supporting skinheads working on an SAS operation.
Outside of Anfield (and of course our media) everybody is laughing at them. I just left a shop and they are all braying like donkeys over this latest Klopp-clip. The man is seriously demented if he believes what he's saying, and if he does what does that tell us about the drooling morons who hang onto his every word?The most needy and pitiful part is that he’s actually ascribed a number to it. He must have sat down and considered to what empirical extent it means more, possibly rejecting four times as too conservative and six times as disproportionately high. Maybe he thought it was 5.4 times more, but decided to round it down to the nearest whole number for fear of looking ridiculous.