Liverpool Thread - 2023/24

[chaddblue]

Hopefully Jones gets an extra game for a frivolous appeal and McCallister gets a 3 game ban for accusing the refs of cheating

 

[BrianW]

My guess is that Liverpool will be 'compensated' by ludicrous decisions in their favour. Just for a change.

 

[zandvoort blue]

Well I hope they ask for Darren England to be relived of VAR duties for all of their future games. They have historically benefitted from his VAR decisions for a number of dodgy decisions.

 

[blueinsa]

As predicted, as soon as a team in Red is fucked over there has to be changes and hell to pay.

 

[MadchesterCity]

So how does that work then when it was already wrongly flagged as offside?

The dippers are not normally flagged offside

 

[MadchesterCity]

They have now publicly said it wasn’t checked because the VAR thought it had been given as a goal on the pitch. So they consciously didn’t check a marginal Liverpool goal because they thought it had been allowed. There is a conspiracy alright, but not the one the scousers are implying.

Exactly this!! You could say they’ve been caught red handed

 

[P-Nic85]

Love the fact that a match that didnt have anything to do with City has resulted in the huge number of posts. It's almost asif Liverpool were in your heads!!!

says a scouser on a manchester city fans forum , typical scouser , no self awareness

Yeah it’s in our heads cause it’s funny as fuck watching the sad cunts play victim, as per

 

[give it to gordon]

And these knobheads moan about something going against them. Nothing said when they cheat

 

[Indaparkside]

Love the fact that a match that didnt have anything to do with City has resulted in the huge number of posts. It's almost asif Liverpool were in your heads!!!
The whole tribalism and increased animosity between our clubs is something that personally disappoints me, but it also amuses me when so many go deep into it.

From my POV and in true Greggery Peccery style, talking about football.... The ref really only made one mistake.
That being the first yellow for Jota. The fact that there are no VAR checks for somethign so seemingly innocuous is perhaps a problem, but with his stupidity of diving in for that challenge so soon after. Well Jota left the ref with no choice.
Jones being sent off. No intent, contact with the ball, but even if his foot "slipped off the top of the ball", that means he was not in full control and with studs up. Well, that is reckless and red card was a cert.
As for the "offisde", well that was given by the assistant and once done then it is down to the VAR officials. Ads has been seen, it was them that made the error, with the ref actually just going along wityh what they said and what his assistant had indicated.

As for the statement and as has been said, I do think it has been very carefully worded. However, I dont see the litigation that so many on here predict going forward. For the simple reason that there is no way you can litigate for simple human error in relation to a football match. I see the wording more as looking to start a process where VAR as it stands is overhauled. The cynic in me when considering FSGs craving for money, makes me wonder if they have a share in the company that did the World Cup VAR system?

I love the fact you got fucked over you fucking knob rot

 

[cookster]

Love the fact that a match that didnt have anything to do with City has resulted in the huge number of posts. It's almost asif Liverpool were in your heads!!!
The whole tribalism and increased animosity between our clubs is something that personally disappoints me, but it also amuses me when so many go deep into it.

From my POV and in true Greggery Peccery style, talking about football.... The ref really only made one mistake.
That being the first yellow for Jota. The fact that there are no VAR checks for somethign so seemingly innocuous is perhaps a problem, but with his stupidity of diving in for that challenge so soon after. Well Jota left the ref with no choice.
Jones being sent off. No intent, contact with the ball, but even if his foot "slipped off the top of the ball", that means he was not in full control and with studs up. Well, that is reckless and red card was a cert.
As for the "offisde", well that was given by the assistant and once done then it is down to the VAR officials. Ads has been seen, it was them that made the error, with the ref actually just going along wityh what they said and what his assistant had indicated.

As for the statement and as has been said, I do think it has been very carefully worded. However, I dont see the litigation that so many on here predict going forward. For the simple reason that there is no way you can litigate for simple human error in relation to a football match. I see the wording more as looking to start a process where VAR as it stands is overhauled. The cynic in me when considering FSGs craving for money, makes me wonder if they have a share in the company that did the World Cup VAR system?

Probably because of the insinuation that the UAE had something to do with the decision.
Some of your fans are beyond help.