halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,133
This is a common thought experiment to explore the nature of morality and self-motivated behaviour in humans. There is obviously truth to the exercise.
But it is not in contradiction to my assertion that most people are just trying to make it through the day the best they can, whilst taking care of those that rely on them (or that they perceive rely on them).
Again, these concepts are not mutually exclusive. People often want to reduce things down to binary states: true or false, this or that, us or them.
But the world very rarely works that way. Almost nothing is absolute. Each person is a multitude—sometimes on balance for the good, sometimes for the bad, but most often firmly in between.
As I said in my previous post, everyone has moments that test their ideals, and moments where they compromise them for their own (or their loved ones’) gain. But that doesn’t mean such self-interested behaviour consumes their every waking moment. Or even most of them.
I think you and I see the world differently, which is why we clash so much on so many topics. You tend to see things in absolutist terms, with only rare instances of nuance. Whereas I tend to see things in relativist terms, with only rare instances of absolutes.
And that transfers over to how we see people. It seems, based on your statements, that if a person has ever kicked a cat for £10,000, then they are inherently a self-interested person. Whereas, for me, a person having kicked a cat for £10,000 is not enough evidence of their self-serving nature.
Because we have all been tested and failed. Some of us many times. But we have also been tested and passed. Often, again, many times.
We are not merely the sum total of our mistakes and moments of weakness. And I would hate to walk through the world with that mindset.
At any rate, Henderson is a ****, for many reasons. But he isn’t an evil ****. And perhaps he’ll surprise us all and continue his advocacy whilst playing in Saudi Arabia.
Though, if I am honest, I sincerely doubt it, for the same reason that most members of the LGBTQ+ community there don’t, even if he has far, far more protection and power.
Which is really where my disappointment lies: not in him being a ****, just him being one that wastes a position few of us will ever realise.
I absolutely disagree with the suggestion I am absolutist :)
But at least we can agree that VAR as implemented is absolutely awful?