Liverpool Thread | 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mad Eyed Screamer said:
Twat doesn't even realise the big error he has missed.
His father in law born in Moss Side in the 30's supports the rags.
So let's just say in 1941 he was 8.
Guess where the rags were playing home games in 1941 until 1947?
Yes Moss Side you thick scouse twat
Click to expand...
Rags must feel very sad and irrelevant when dippers are talking them up as Manchester's biggest club.
 
Protein Junkie said:
www.bbc.co.uk

Man who ran illegal football streaming service jailed

Jonathan Edge was caught selling reprogrammed Firestick devices after advertising on Facebook.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk

Ycnmiu. They even know how to jib in digitally !!!
Click to expand...
Joking aside. Tell me another victimless crime that would attract such a sentence ?
Yet again the Judges are supporting big business. Money looking after money. Judges looking after the system they are part of, fuck the little man. The ordinary bloke in the street.
He hasn't hurt anybody, not even financially and yet he gets 3 years. Effin disgrace
 
Blue Mist said:
Joking aside. Tell me another victimless crime that would attract such a sentence ?
Yet again the Judges are supporting big business. Money looking after money. Judges looking after the system they are part of, fuck the little man. The ordinary bloke in the street.
He hasn't hurt anybody, not even financially and yet he gets 3 years. Effin disgrace
Click to expand...

He should have jipped the govt out of tens of millions in PPE gear that either never arrived or was unfit, then he's have just got a few lines in a newspaper with no punitive punishment.
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
View attachment 138048

84569 vs Stoke still a record today. Liverpool’s highest attendance wouldn’t make our top 20. Funnily enough we had higher average attendances than them with Keegan and Stuart Pearce in charge.
Click to expand...

I’ve been reliably told that in Keegans days John Wardle used to buy all the tickets…
 
Blue Mist said:
Joking aside. Tell me another victimless crime that would attract such a sentence ?
Yet again the Judges are supporting big business. Money looking after money. Judges looking after the system they are part of, fuck the little man. The ordinary bloke in the street.
He hasn't hurt anybody, not even financially and yet he gets 3 years. Effin disgrace
Click to expand...
The magnitude of his crime is immaterial, he stole from the wrong people, he stole from very rich, very powerful people, there is no greater crime and his sentence reflects that.
 
Kiddy fiddling and rape are classed as social crimes. Suspended sentences and community work are the normal punishment.
The majority of women in prison were there for no TV license? (one third?)
Rob a bank and get at least ten years.

Decent people know sentences are wrong, or not enough for certain crimes. But we don't have the power, or the collective will to alter them.
The rich will always protect the rich.

Convicted felons can be President these days, as long as you are rich FFS!
 
Last edited:
Blue Mist said:
Joking aside. Tell me another victimless crime that would attract such a sentence ?
Yet again the Judges are supporting big business. Money looking after money. Judges looking after the system they are part of, fuck the little man. The ordinary bloke in the street.
He hasn't hurt anybody, not even financially and yet he gets 3 years. Effin disgrace
Click to expand...
This is the real crime @premierleague When will something be done about these
prices?
• Sky Sports: £40/month
$
• TNT Sport: £22.50/month
$
• Amazon Prime: £9/month
That's £888 a year to watch football on a screen!
 
Blue Mist said:
Joking aside. Tell me another victimless crime that would attract such a sentence ?
Yet again the Judges are supporting big business. Money looking after money. Judges looking after the system they are part of, fuck the little man. The ordinary bloke in the street.
He hasn't hurt anybody, not even financially and yet he gets 3 years. Effin disgrace
Click to expand...
Its one of the only times they actually get very serious about solving crime. Rich person getting robbed is another.
 
Blue Mist said:
Joking aside. Tell me another victimless crime that would attract such a sentence ?
Yet again the Judges are supporting big business. Money looking after money. Judges looking after the system they are part of, fuck the little man. The ordinary bloke in the street.
He hasn't hurt anybody, not even financially and yet he gets 3 years. Effin disgrace
Click to expand...
"...a street kid gets arrested, gonna do some time, he got out three years from now, to commit more crime;
a business man is caught, with 24 kilos, he's out on bail, and out of jail, and that's the way it goes;
RAAH!"
 
Just to ensure that we all know the desperate lengths the dipper imaginations will go to to persuade each other that CITY are about to be 'destroyed' - here is an example from today:

Quote from: DangerScouse on Yesterday at 11:51:06 pm
Have they ever acknowleged and attempted to justify theyr refusal to co-operate since 2018? It's quite an amazing stance from a club purporting to have nothing to hide.
Click to expand...
I've not seen anything, but there's no credible justification they could offer. Since they've been cheating, plenty of other clubs have co-operated with the Premier League and many have been fined, and some docked points.

City's failure to comply with requests since 2018 only reinforces their guilt, and the likelihood of all the suspicions and charges being true. There's every chance they'll get punished for the 115 charges, and then face another investigation covering the last 6 years. I still think there's no way the PL would ever have gone public with such a long list of charges without being absolutely certain of their evidence, and chances of making it all stick. They know their own rules, and will have written them with expert legal advice as it's a multi-£billion global league. They wouldn't risk their own reputation and the league's credibility by going public with a case they might lose. The recent developments of us, Utd, Chelsea and Spurs submitting our intentions to sue for compensation are further evidence that multiple parties are preparing for City's downfall.

The best thing is that if they are severely punished for the initial charges then it guarantees there is plenty more to come. It would be like a criminal being put behind bars and their sentence being extended when more crimes come to light. The added bonus is that this would tarnish Guardiola's reputation forever, along with some of the most dislikeable players and fans in football history. City Football Group would also never be the same, as I imagine Sheik Mansour and his gang of crooks will quickly sell up and retreat to the desert in the aftermath.
 
Oldham Exile said:
Just to ensure that we all know the desperate lengths the dipper imaginations will go to to persuade each other that CITY are about to be 'destroyed' - here is an example from today:

Quote from: DangerScouse on Yesterday at 11:51:06 pm

I've not seen anything, but there's no credible justification they could offer. Since they've been cheating, plenty of other clubs have co-operated with the Premier League and many have been fined, and some docked points.

City's failure to comply with requests since 2018 only reinforces their guilt, and the likelihood of all the suspicions and charges being true. There's every chance they'll get punished for the 115 charges, and then face another investigation covering the last 6 years. I still think there's no way the PL would ever have gone public with such a long list of charges without being absolutely certain of their evidence, and chances of making it all stick. They know their own rules, and will have written them with expert legal advice as it's a multi-£billion global league. They wouldn't risk their own reputation and the league's credibility by going public with a case they might lose. The recent developments of us, Utd, Chelsea and Spurs submitting our intentions to sue for compensation are further evidence that multiple parties are preparing for City's downfall.

The best thing is that if they are severely punished for the initial charges then it guarantees there is plenty more to come. It would be like a criminal being put behind bars and their sentence being extended when more crimes come to light. The added bonus is that this would tarnish Guardiola's reputation forever, along with some of the most dislikeable players and fans in football history. City Football Group would also never be the same, as I imagine Sheik Mansour and his gang of crooks will quickly sell up and retreat to the desert in the aftermath.
Click to expand...
You would really think a scouser of all people would understand the value of going no comment
 
Oldham Exile said:
Just to ensure that we all know the desperate lengths the dipper imaginations will go to to persuade each other that CITY are about to be 'destroyed' - here is an example from today:

Quote from: DangerScouse on Yesterday at 11:51:06 pm

I've not seen anything, but there's no credible justification they could offer. Since they've been cheating, plenty of other clubs have co-operated with the Premier League and many have been fined, and some docked points.

City's failure to comply with requests since 2018 only reinforces their guilt, and the likelihood of all the suspicions and charges being true. There's every chance they'll get punished for the 115 charges, and then face another investigation covering the last 6 years. I still think there's no way the PL would ever have gone public with such a long list of charges without being absolutely certain of their evidence, and chances of making it all stick. They know their own rules, and will have written them with expert legal advice as it's a multi-£billion global league. They wouldn't risk their own reputation and the league's credibility by going public with a case they might lose. The recent developments of us, Utd, Chelsea and Spurs submitting our intentions to sue for compensation are further evidence that multiple parties are preparing for City's downfall.

The best thing is that if they are severely punished for the initial charges then it guarantees there is plenty more to come. It would be like a criminal being put behind bars and their sentence being extended when more crimes come to light. The added bonus is that this would tarnish Guardiola's reputation forever, along with some of the most dislikeable players and fans in football history. City Football Group would also never be the same, as I imagine Sheik Mansour and his gang of crooks will quickly sell up and retreat to the desert in the aftermath.
Click to expand...

They know their own rules, and will have written them with expert legal advice as it's a multi-£billion global league.

Lol

Again of all the fan bases you would think the dippers would believe in innocent until proven guilty.
Seem to me that the dippers are always innocent everyone else is guilty
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top