Liverpool Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
They do, when it started going wrong for Rodgers after he went close in the league in 2014, they pretty soon had him jettisoned out. Then what about Roy Hodgson? They hounded him out in space of six months.

Rafa Benitez, won the champions league in his first year. Dined on that for six years, spent a lot of money with Liverpool parting ways with him when they’d finished in 7th.

Carragher’s judgment is clouded because of Klopp’s length of service and him going on his own terms. Liverpool ploughing through money and making wrong management decisions is a return to normal form. This pretty much happened since Dalgiesh left.

Exactly the same with The Shite. Post Busby the club was hiring n firing for fun. Then they had GPC. Then post GPC they have reverted to form.

Coming out with shite like ,”its not the united/liverpool way… blah blah” infers that they are different, morally superior.
They arent. They are no different.

If i ever hear anyone say “its not the City way to sack coaches” ill punch em on the ear
 
You Evertonians, he was a season ticket holder at Everton with his family, wasn't he?

He really is a 'massive' wanker.
Obviously the irony of him gloating at the 16minute mark of a match about Evertonians never learning about giving it out too soon is completely lost on the thick, spitting twat.
 
Exactly the same with The Shite. Post Busby the club was hiring n firing for fun. Then they had GPC. Then post GPC they have reverted to form.

Coming out with shite like ,”its not the united/liverpool way… blah blah” infers that they are different, morally superior.
They arent. They are no different.

If i ever hear anyone say “its not the City way to sack coaches” ill punch em on the ear

* Steve Coppell likes this post
 
How the fuck was he moaning at the ref about this?
I think he did it on purpose. I think him and some of the others players want Slot gone and are half trying. I hope I am wrong and that they are just pure shite.
 
Dalglish - won nothing during that period.

Rodgers - won nothing.

Klopp - one title in a decade.

The only manager you could argue they got right was Slot, despite current form.

Everything else is scouse propaganda.
Dalglish won the League Cup before they sacked him

Rodgers came within a whisker of winning the league and may well have done if Slippy hadn't fucked up against Chelsea

Klopp was up against the greatest manager and greatest team this country has ever seen for much of his tenure. Or are you suggesting that City weren't all that?

All I'm saying is that Postecoglou falls well short of any of those appointments based on his current stock
 
And Pep. You are not saying the manager doesn't matter, are you?

Pep won 100 pts with Delph at LB and Otamendi as our main CB.
Of course the manager matters and the style of play is down to the manager. Apart from Clichy the year he won it with Mancini i don’t think we’ve ever had a proper decent left back(ironically until now). Delph was actually superb that year.

If you’ve got KDB, David Silva, prime Dinho, Sergio Aguero, 2 top wingers and Vinnie when fit you’ve got some chance with a very special team. The players are the key. Now we have very few genuinely great players. Great players have left and when you stop signing great players you inevitably stop being a great team. Doesn’t matter who the manager is if you don’t have the players you aren’t winning the big pots.
 
Dalglish won the League Cup before they sacked him

Rodgers came within a whisker of winning the league and may well have done if Slippy hadn't fucked up against Chelsea

Klopp was up against the greatest manager and greatest team this country has ever seen for much of his tenure. Or are you suggesting that City weren't all that?

All I'm saying is that Postecoglou falls well short of any of those appointments based on his current stock

A single league cup is irrelevant when judging success of a manager. If anything it highlights the failure if that’s all there is to hang his hat on.

Rodgers - history is littered with near misses. Simple truth is he had the team to win the league and failed to get them over the line.

Klopp - he was up against the greatest manager of all time. So what? This is elite sport - going up against the best in the league is no excuse when the target is being the best in the league. ie, if Klopp won four in row, would we be saying Pep was still a success because it’s just unfortunate he went up against Klopp?

Postecoglou may well fall short - my point is previous managers have done as well, so it would be going with trend.
 
Last edited:
A single league cup is irrelevant when judging success of a manager. If anything it highlights the failure of that’s all there is to hang his hat on.

Rodger’s - history is littered with near misses. Simple truth is he had the team to win the league and failed to get them over the line.

Klopp - he was up against the greatest manager of all time. So what? This is elite sport - going up against the best in the league is no excuse when the target is being the best in the league. ie, if Klopp won four in row, would we be saying Pep was still a success because it’s just unfortunate he went up against Klopp?

Postecoglou may well fall short - my point is previous managers have done as well, so it would be going with trend.
If you think Postecoglou is up the standard or their other recent appointments then you're fucking deluded mate. I hate Liverpool as much as the next man but your post smacks of bitterness.
 
If you think Postecoglou is up the standard or their other recent appointments thenuuu you're fucking deluded mate. I hate Liverpool as much as the next man but your post smacks of bitterness.

I said Postecoglou may well fall short - but that it would be on trend with previous appointments.

I don’t see anything controversial in that. When you look past the bluff at the actual trophies won, those managers have by and large been failures.

If you told me the next City manager after Pep would be at the club for a decade and win one league title and one champions league, I would class that as a significant underachievement.
 
Of course the manager matters and the style of play is down to the manager. Apart from Clichy the year he won it with Mancini i don’t think we’ve ever had a proper decent left back(ironically until now). Delph was actually superb that year.

If you’ve got KDB, David Silva, prime Dinho, Sergio Aguero, 2 top wingers and Vinnie when fit you’ve got some chance with a very special team. The players are the key. Now we have very few genuinely great players. Great players have left and when you stop signing great players you inevitably stop being a great team. Doesn’t matter who the manager is if you don’t have the players you aren’t winning the big pots.

If the players are *the* key, why is Pep the only manager in English football to win 4 titles in a row? Didn't United, Arsenal, Chelsea have great players as well, especially Ferguson's United and Mourinho's Chelsea 04-06?

Of course, players are very important, but it takes an exceptional manager to win multiple PL titles in a row.
 
If the players are *the* key, why is Pep the only manager in English football to win 4 titles in a row? Didn't United, Arsenal, Chelsea have great players as well, especially Ferguson's United and Mourinho's Chelsea 04-06?

Of course, players are very important, but it takes an exceptional manager to win multiple PL titles in a row.
Schlotty not as fuckin cocky now eh! Should we ask him if its HIS last season against cheating City as well as the diving Egyptian!
At worst, all weve done is invest in the business against specifically rigged rules, nothing anywhere near as bad as these wankers.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top