Liverpool Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Having to do some emergency work in ramsgate today, of course I had my City hat on.
Along comes the street cleaner 'take that shit of your head'
Me' that's no way to talk to a council worker'
Him ' i support the best every club '
Me ' going by your accent you are from the west country so must be Exter City.
Him ' no its Liverpool and your lot are cheats'
Me ' oh when did the verdict come out '?
Him ' its hasnt but its clear you are cheats'
Me' well at least we didnt kill 39 Italian fans.
Him' that's below the belt'.
 
Having to do some emergency work in ramsgate today, of course I had my City hat on.
Along comes the street cleaner 'take that shit of your head'
Me' that's no way to talk to a council worker'
Him ' i support the best every club '
Me ' going by your accent you are from the west country so must be Exter City.
Him ' no its Liverpool and your lot are cheats'
Me ' oh when did the verdict come out '?
Him ' its hasnt but its clear you are cheats'
Me' well at least we didnt kill 39 Italian fans.
Him' that's below the belt'.
God man!
 
Having to do some emergency work in ramsgate today, of course I had my City hat on.
Along comes the street cleaner 'take that shit of your head'
Me' that's no way to talk to a council worker'
Him ' i support the best every club '
Me ' going by your accent you are from the west country so must be Exter City.
Him ' no its Liverpool and your lot are cheats'
Me ' oh when did the verdict come out '?
Him ' its hasnt but its clear you are cheats'
Me' well at least we didnt kill 39 Italian fans.
Him' that's below the belt'.
They don’t like it up ‘em.
 
I love the idea of someone approaching me randomly and trying to start a similar conversation. They wouldn't be doing it again in a hurry.
Obviously none of that would happen in the first place.
Thing is, one is an unproven allegation against our club, the other is a matter of historical fact in relation to their supporters. So firstly it’s like shooting fish in a barrel, but secondly how can something be ‘below the belt’ if it’s verifiably correct?

Fucking hilarious that they get offended by refences to something that is demonstrably true!
 
Thing is, one is an unproven allegation against our club, the other is a matter of historical fact in relation to their supporters. So firstly it’s like shooting fish in a barrel, but secondly how can something be ‘below the belt’ if it’s verifiably correct?

Fucking hilarious that they get offended by refences to something that is demonstrably true!

It’s like Jeffrey Dahlmer crying about someone calling him a serial killer. They never want to take responsibility and own what happened as a fan base, it’s always a crumbling stadium, Chelsea fans or Thatcher sending in the SAS to infiltrate them.
 
It’s like Jeffrey Dahlmer crying about someone calling him a serial killer. They never want to take responsibility and own what happened as a fan base, it’s always a crumbling stadium, Chelsea fans or Thatcher sending in the SAS to infiltrate them.
Can’t believe you left the Belgian skinheads off that post!
 
A certain irony in Slots post match ....maybe they need Salah back , the Diving King .

Slot is always quick to blame the ref ....but he's such a nice chap isn't he .

Ekitike was unfortunate not to get a penalty when he stayed on his feet under a challenge from Jaka Bijol in the box, which was at the centre of Slot's post-match reflections.

"If he had fallen down it would probably have been a penalty but this season so many times when we were fouled we did not get a penalty," Slot said.

"This season we have conceded a few soft penalties but Brentford away with Cody Gakpo the referee said, 'play on' so our players try to stay on our feet and then it is hard for the VAR to interfere."

And Slot said that he would never encourage his players to go down.
 
A certain irony in Slots post match ....maybe they need Salah back , the Diving King .

Slot is always quick to blame the ref ....but he's such a nice chap isn't he .

Ekitike was unfortunate not to get a penalty when he stayed on his feet under a challenge from Jaka Bijol in the box, which was at the centre of Slot's post-match reflections.

"If he had fallen down it would probably have been a penalty but this season so many times when we were fouled we did not get a penalty," Slot said.

"This season we have conceded a few soft penalties but Brentford away with Cody Gakpo the referee said, 'play on' so our players try to stay on our feet and then it is hard for the VAR to interfere."

And Slot said that he would never encourage his players to go down.

Well we know his team be diving now that is encouragement and I bet it was VVD who was telling the team that he should have dived! Thing is now you have to dive because referees will not give a pen if you stay in your feet if you get kicked !
 
Well we know his team be diving now that is encouragement and I bet it was VVD who was telling the team that he should have dived! Thing is now you have to dive because referees will not give a pen if you stay in your feet if you get kicked !
Yes . GVardiol should have gone to ground last night . Mind you Foden did against Newcastle and Cherki last week at Forest and it made no difference . We get penalised for playing on and trying to score whether we fall over or not .

Difference is Pep isn't whining and moaning to the press . He's quickly gone Full Dipper .
 
Yes . GVardiol should have gone to ground last night . Mind you Foden did against Newcastle and Cherki last week at Forest and it made no difference . We get penalised for playing on and trying to score whether we fall over or not .

Difference is Pep isn't whining and moaning to the press . He's quickly gone Full Dipper .
Minus the perm.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top