bluecore said:
I think the OP is being naive.
Thaksin is a corrupt Thai politician, there is no other kind. Corruption is a fundamental part of the political system in Thailand. Whether he's more of less corrupt than the PM's before or after him is a moot point. Just because a few Thai farmers wave some flags doesn't prove anything.
Thaksin was mentioned as having 'questions to answer' by the UNHCR after the shooting of many 'drug dealers' who just happened to also be student activists and supporters of an independent southern, muslim, state. IIRC the figures were 2.000 suspicious deaths in 3 months. This is no trifling matter and the UNHCR is way above local political influence.
He was wrong 'un - no question.
He bought us for 2 reasons; to boost his profile, particularly at home, and to make money - he managed to do both.
At the time we were deep in the shit, we needed a serious injection of dosh. Thaksin gave us that - a lot of it was borrowed but he kept us going / spending.
It was a bizarre episode in our history but he didn't wreck the club and he found us a true sugar daddy. I'm no fan of his but I will alays be greatful for the impact he had on us.
You are taking the mick mate, he is answerable for shooting many drug dealers? Our leaders send our armies all over the world killing tens of thousands each year!!!
And also you think he bought City to make money, we were on our arse at the time so how could he foresee a profit?
I agree he helped us by selling to the Arabs but he was forced to do so.