Lord Pannick to represent City / Pannick's OJ-style Summation

Would be good but I doubt it'll work like that, hope you're right though.

The thing is this panel completely influenced by the Hateful 8/9 already have us banged to rights, there's no way they'll come down on our side, our hopes will rest with an appeal, preferably heard by non football loving advocates who can see through the Premier League shit.
Just a bit of positive thinking really. There's too much mud been thrown as other blues have said some of its going to stick... unfortunately. If the PL panel contains any members or x members that have been or who are affiliated with any club in PL then I'd be taking that to court 1st.
 
Would be good but I doubt it'll work like that, hope you're right though.

The thing is this panel completely influenced by the Hateful 8/9 already have us banged to rights, there's no way they'll come down on our side, our hopes will rest with an appeal, preferably heard by non football loving advocates who can see through the Premier League shit.
Any appeal will just involve the same process, but a different panel, again set up by the PL,
after that, it seems we have little chance of going to the courts, according to some, but I'm
not sure.
 
What did you think about George Graham's £425k bung back in 95? Do you think that's the only bent deal your club have been involved in?

I'm guessing all Clubs have a bit of dirty washing in their history but not one club other than City is being investigated and charged, it's a fucking stitch up, in plain sight.

Look at your Chav neighbours, putting the club at risk with ridiculous bending of the rules and back into debt after writing Roman's 1.6b loan off, we're debt free and the best run group in Sport. The development of East Manchester, bailing out Barclay's and investing in the Academy apparently counts for fuck all, what's more important it seems is to make up all kinds of ridiculous rules to catch us out. Your club and the co conspirators are a fucking disgrace.

Graham was a lone wolf, got caught and was sacked by the club. Read my other posts and you’ll see I’ve been generally supportive of City.
 
It would be ironic it the Government that wants low regulation ends up stepping in and imposing an external regulator on these Muppets. Would serve them right.

The FA PL understandably want to continue to be self regulating and this enquiry into City, in my view, is to demonstrate to the government that their robust actions in this case prove they can be trusted as the ultimate arbiter. I think there’s a big risk the opposite will be the case when a light is shone on the rules of the FA PL making independent regulation not only more likely but necessary. I think the FA PL are a bunch of amateurs and haven’t thought this through. Their enquiry is a sword that can cut both ways. That’s just my view.
 
Any appeal will just involve the same process, but a different panel, again set up by the PL,
after that, it seems we have little chance of going to the courts, according to some, but I'm
not sure.
I'd think in an extraordinary situation the Club would be allowed to take the issue further especially when Mr Khaldoon has a word at Number 10.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.