I can kind of understand the denial. If you worked for somebody that long and only ever saw good things you'd find it hard to believe, probably just an emotional defense. Just shows the only victims werent the people he abused, his friends and anyone close to him were taken for a ride also. I do think a lot of the "we had no idea" stuff is bollocks also, your average joe had heard all the rumours about him and they didnt work at the bbc but people at the bbc knew nothing....Im not having it.
What i dont understand is why the stuff about him shagging dead bodys isnt widely reported but the child abuse is? Do the media think that might be too much for the public to handle?
Paxman put forward an interesting take on it recently. He reckoned that the BBC in the 60s was run by people who regarded everything to do with pop/rock music as decadent. They didn't want any of it anywhere near the BBC. But they were told by the Home Office they had to run a pop music station and have pop on the telly. Which meant turning a blind eye to some behaviour they didn't like. The trouble was that they were then incapable of drawing a line as to what was acceptable and ended up regarding Radio 1/TOTP as a separate entity, a law unto itself, nothing to do with them.