Think its a decent deal for them too, get Palmer for a year and spend the £60 mill on a striker.Wait only on loan? That's a good deal for us. So 60 mil plus Palmer on loan for 12 months. That's a good deal for us. Sounds ridiculous that West ham would agree to that.
What would Paqueta have to do with Phillips different positions. If Phillips were to leave we’d have to find a replacement.Kalvin may not want to leave but if Paqueta signs he may as well go West Ham because he is done
Pep clearly doesn’t rate him one bit
They wouldn’t have gotten 105 without us throwing them a bone. They could repay the favor by shaving off five mil off this deal for usThey paid £50m for him last season and won a European trophy with him. He was their joint-best player alongside Rice and they've just sold their prized asset for £105m. Only fair for them to demand £80m or above in this market.
I'd take that in half a heartbeat. More time for Palmer to develop with much more regular action than he would get with us even if we did nothing else this window.Wait only on loan? That's a good deal for us. So 60 mil plus Palmer on loan for 12 months. That's a good deal for us. Sounds ridiculous that West ham would agree to that.
60, THB and a Palmer loan?Wait only on loan? That's a good deal for us. So 60 mil plus Palmer on loan for 12 months. That's a good deal for us. Sounds ridiculous that West ham would agree to that.
To replace what?What would Paqueta have to do with Phillips different positions. If Phillips were to leave we’d have to find a replacement.