Lucas Paqueta investigated by FA for alleged betting breaches

Fee was always going to be lofty anyway but this Caicedo business will have inflated it even further unfortunately.
Why? Caicedo was one of the stand out performers at a team that finished 6th. He's 21 year-old and has four years left on his contract. He's got the potential to be a generational talent, so while he might be a bit pricey, you can understand why. Can anyone say they genuinely thought about Paqueta as a contender for team of the season before we were linked with him the other day? Or even team of the season if we excluded the top four?

I suspect we're interested in Paqueta because we thought we might be able to do it at a decent price. If we can't, we'll walk away. We always do.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.