Lucy Letby infant murders trial

[Mr Kobayashi]

And her legal team will be rubbing their hands with joy. Xmas came early at the tax payers expense.

As she was found guilty for the murder charges, I'm pretty certain that she'll be getting a new solicitor and barristers.

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

Well, yeah I understand that mate, I was just saying I'm not sure if I'd want (as the parent) for there to be a retrial.. that was the point I was making, but, if they do, whoever the parents are, then that should be up to them. I don't know anything about law, and order, but I'd hope the bereaved have a say in the matter.. they're surely not saying though "I don't think she killed my baby!, mine died of genetics" or whatever.

You're mistaken. She's being retried for an attempted murder charge. The baby lived.

If this is one of the children left with life time injuries and specialist care, a guilty verdict may have a bearing on compensation due from a negligence claim or criminal compensation.

I'm sure it's not primarily about that and you would hope the children get the care they need anyway but these things have to be considered.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

At legal aid rates? A privately paid fraud would be five times as much.

And ‘legal team’ is the wankest term in the English language. It’s the expression that small time businessmen use to describe their solicitor.

Check out this legal eagle.

 

[GaudinoMotors]

As she was found guilty for the murder charges, I'm pretty certain that she'll be getting a new solicitor and barristers.

Advocates?
;-)

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

As she was found guilty for the murder charges, I'm pretty certain that she'll be getting a new solicitor and barristers.

Don’t think she’ll be afforded that luxury.

 

[Johnny Mars Bar]

Maybe when Russell Brand eventually gets sent down for noncery they can share a cell.

 

[Stephen230]

Maybe when Russell Brand eventually gets sent down for noncery they can share a cell.

Might be some more candidates after Panarama on Monday night.

 

[doots]

Might be some more candidates after Panarama on Monday night.

Aussie version:-)

 

[Uncle Wally One Ball]

Check out this legal eagle.

I read that in the internal voice of Tony Soprano

 

[PinkFinal]

PETER HITCHENS: What if Lucy Letby is not guilty?

I must ask: What if Lucy Letby is not guilty? Actually I very much wish somebody else in the national media would raise this. I have enough enemies as it is. But it looks as if it falls to me.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

PETER HITCHENS: What if Lucy Letby is not guilty?

I must ask: What if Lucy Letby is not guilty? Actually I very much wish somebody else in the national media would raise this. I have enough enemies as it is. But it looks as if it falls to me.

www.dailymail.co.uk

What do you think about it?

 

[Mon Autre]

PETER HITCHENS: What if Lucy Letby is not guilty?

I must ask: What if Lucy Letby is not guilty? Actually I very much wish somebody else in the national media would raise this. I have enough enemies as it is. But it looks as if it falls to me.

www.dailymail.co.uk

An especially unhinged article even by the Daily Mail's standards.

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

An especially unhinged article even by the Daily Mail's standards.

It's obvious that Hitchens is being a contrarian for the sake of it. One of of his famous tropes thrown in for good measure, "why am I the lone voice to question this?".

 

[Elbow beards]

It's obvious that Hitchens is being a contrarian for the sake of it. One of of his famous tropes thrown in for good measure, "why am I the lone voice to question this?".

Fucking **** of a man, you'd be better educated reading the Beano.

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

An especially unhinged article even by the Daily Mail's standards.

I await the write up on ‘What if Jeffrey Dahmer was innocent’.

 

[Mon Autre]

It's obvious that Hitchens is being a contrarian for the sake of it. One of of his famous tropes thrown in for good measure, "why am I the lone voice to question this?".

Definitely, but even so, betraying the fact he clearly has a low key pervy crush on her is a weird flex.

 

[Stephen230]

It's obvious that Hitchens is being a contrarian for the sake of it. One of of his famous tropes thrown in for good measure, "why am I the lone voice to question this?".

I dunno. I’m not saying his motives are pure. And I’m certainty not saying that I think she’s innocent.

But I’ve read several independent articles from legal professionals who followed the case a lot closer than I did, saying her defence case was a little strange, to say the least.

So I think he might have a point on that at least. Whether it was strange enough to justify an appeal, I wouldn’t have any idea.

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

I dunno. I’m not saying his motives are pure. And I’m certainty not saying that I think she’s innocent.

But I’ve read several independent articles from legal professionals who followed the case a lot closer than I did, saying her defence case was a little strange, to say the least.

So I think he might have a point on that at least. Whether it was strange enough to justify an appeal, I wouldn’t have any idea.

Lucy Letby: initials of babies noted in diary on dates of alleged attacks, court told

Note saying ‘I don’t know if I killed them. Maybe I did’ also seen in Manchester trial of nurse accused of murdering seven babies

www.theguardian.com

This was damning for me. If she was innocent surely she'd have not done that, or have had initials of babies who weren't part of the investigation.

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

I dunno. I’m not saying his motives are pure. And I’m certainty not saying that I think she’s innocent.

But I’ve read several independent articles from legal professionals who followed the case a lot closer than I did, saying her defence case was a little strange, to say the least.

So I think he might have a point on that at least. Whether it was strange enough to justify an appeal, I wouldn’t have any idea.

Lack of witnesses, only one person who was a plumber at the hospital spoke in her defence that raw sewage had been seen coming out of one of the sinks on a unit she worked on. Why did her defence only have this one person and no one else able to contribute? The prosecution on the other hand had a raft of people.

 

[GortonBlue62]

Here's an article suggesting she must be allowed to appeal...

Lucy Letby Must Be Allowed an Appeal – The Daily Sceptic

The case against Lucy Letby is far from watertight, says Prof David Livermore. Many more babies died than she was blamed for, and she wasn't even on shift when a key insulin bag was changed. She must be allowed an appeal.

dailysceptic.org

... I'd hate to be a juror on this trial.