M62 Police Shooting

stony said:
Still a poor excuse. If the current body cams can't be used then there will be others that could.
Click to expand...

I agree that it would be useful for them to wear them.

My point was in reply to it being suspicious that they weren't wearing them when it seems that they never wear them due to them not being compatible with their other equipment. That certainly seems to make it less suspicious to me.
 
KnaresboroughBlue said:
I agree that it would be useful for them to wear them.

My point was in reply to it being suspicious that they weren't wearing them when it seems that they never wear them due to them not being compatible with their other equipment. That certainly seems to make it less suspicious to me.
Click to expand...


I don't think this shooting is suspicious, but in my opinion all police officers should carry body cams as a matter of course. It's been proven to cut down police complaints by 90%. There is no good reason they shouldn't wear them.
 
This may seem a bit simplistic but that's me all over, bad cop kills innocent guy not good, throw the book at him, good cop kills bad guy great result, bad cop kills bad guy instead of two bad guys we are left with one still a result.

So this is either a good result or a great result, so happy days stop fucking moaning.
 
Metalartin said:
That sounded more like an opinion than an official response from them regarding the armed police force specifically(pretty important where it's coming from)... sorry but you talk like you have authority where you have none of the time SWP(as wrong as much as you are right I've noticed but in your humble opinion you're never wrong... right?) so that bit got lost.
Click to expand...
I only talk with authority on things I know about and I'd read that this morning.

And no I wouldn't say I'm often wrong. Are you? In your opinion?
 
blueish swede said:
Shooting someone through the front windscreen of a car at 17:30 in the Huddersfield area in early January is suspicious considering sunset was around 16:02.
Click to expand...
Have you seen how bright the slip road is?


JS117016151-car3-news-medium_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqgsaO8O78rhmZrDxTlQBjdGtT0gK_6EfZT336f62EI5U.jpg
 
stony said:
I don't think this shooting is suspicious, but in my opinion all police officers should carry body cams as a matter of course. It's been proven to cut down police complaints by 90%. There is no good reason they shouldn't wear them.
Click to expand...
There is a good reason for not wearing them if the police were on surveillance. There were two cars stopped in different areas, the cars shown surrounding the Audi were unmarked.

Maybe they should have waited until they were outside his house. Plenty of cameras there.
 
blueish swede said:
Shooting someone through the front windscreen of a car at 17:30 in the Huddersfield area in early January is suspicious considering sunset was around 16:02.
Click to expand...


Next time they'll wait till the summer to shoot a scumbag, saves on leccy
 
Metalartin said:
Hollow little victories... only fooling yourself, as well as showing how childish, small and petty you are.
Click to expand...
What the fuck You on about?

I "lol'd" at you saying you're "ansofuckinglutely" right more often than me. I thought you were being jokey?! If not then it was you being petty. Of course we all think what we post is correct or why would we fucking well post in the first place?

You've made a tit of yourself and have obviously got one on you, so wipe your fanny, have a drink and move on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top