Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Psyche.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Madeleine McCann
- Thread starter mcfc22
- Start date
Psyche.
doots
Well-Known Member
Let's get ready to rumblePsyche.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I agree, that was all a bit baffling.Just finished the doc. I don’t get the Tanner sighting and the subsequent coming forward of the guy who says it was probably him.
This happened 3 years after the likely abduction. How does that happen? One of the biggest cases of its type. You were a UK citizen holidaying there with a child of a similar age using the hotel crèche. And it takes 3 years to rule the sighting as innocent.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Why didn’t they take the twins, or plan for it if they shadowed them over the week?
If we’re assuming she was abducted, that’s a good question.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I think it’s reasonable to suggest that if all three ‘disappeared’ simultaneously, then the allegations about the parents’ involvement would carry considerable less force.If we’re assuming she was abducted, that’s a good question.
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
I think it’s reasonable to suggest that if all three ‘disappeared’ simultaneously, then the allegations about the parents’ involvement would carry considerable less force.
Not necessarily mate. Not that I believe this to be the case but, let’s imagine the McCanns were linked to a trafficking or pedo group and they were ‘involved’ in Maddie’s disappearance, there’s nothing to say they couldn’t / wouldn’t have ‘arranged’ for all 3 children to be taken.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
If they were consciously involved in the disappearance of one, given their standing in the community, jobs etc.. it offends logic/common sense they would arrange for all three to be abducted. It would, objectively, draw far more suspicion towards them, surely.Not necessarily mate. Not that I believe this to be the case but, let’s imagine the McCanns were linked to a trafficking or pedo group and they were ‘involved’ in Maddie’s disappearance, there’s nothing to say they couldn’t / wouldn’t have ‘arranged’ for all 3 children to be taken.
If someone’s nicking from the till, why empty the fucker entirely? Leaves no room for doubt. Best just to lift the odd twenty here and there, surely?
And here you go barging in with that condescending tone whilst not making nearly as good points as the other poster who disagrees with me.
“Tried to help you” - I don’t need help, we’re having a discussion and it’s ok to disagree.
I feel there’s a case to be had, it was lax and they should have used the crèche or made it more difficult to enter/leave the apartment by locking it but I don’t believe leaving them 77m away whilst checking on them every 20 minutes is gross negligence.
Your language in the rest of the post shows an element of bias against them and I don’t believe this helps.
Your new mate is very good at sitting on the fence.
I’ve got his number.
Sometimes life is very black and white. For the final time on this thread I’m going to say this and then I’m done with you.
What they did was negligent. You don’t leave your kids unattended, out of view, in an unlocked apartment. Society says you don’t do that and that’s the fucking end of it.
If you think that’s ok then just fucking wow.
God help you man.
That’s me out with you. Cheers.
After posting a load of shite and being pulled up for it you now wanna 'leave it'?
http://missingchildreneurope.eu/Portals/0/Docs/1709_missing_children_study_2013_en_original_1.pdf
As I said in the post you quoted it’s immaterial.
There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that abduction occurs in that part of Portugal? Does that make you feel a little better?
Once again and for the last time.
It. Doesn’t. Matter.
Last time I engage with you. Your in a minority of 2. Perhaps the pair of you should go get a room.
Cheers