Malky Mackay

It's not straightforward. You can't just leak private conversations publicly even if on work equipment, there is an expectation of privacy.
 
What was he to be punished for?
 
You'd like to think that despite getting off from this his reputation will be sullied enough to not get a job in football again. I doubt this will be the case though as football is littered with dinosaurs who see nothing wrong with a bit of casual racism/sexism/homophobia.
 
I don't know, as much as I might object to the content, I am a little uncomfortable with people getting a life sentence from their profession for it. I tend to believe in second chances.
 
I don't know, as much as I might object to the content, I am a little uncomfortable with people getting a life sentence from their profession for it. I tend to believe in second chances.
This is the first time he's been caught, he's got previous. Forest fans will tell you how they feel about him.
I don't disagree with your last sentence.
 
So the FA have decided that they've pissed around long enough that they can let him off without anyone being too bothered, what a surprise. Ridiculous how long it's taken for them to just let him off.

He'll have a new job in no time, with some old dinosaur chairman stating that he's not been found guilty of anything (other than being a shit manager)
 
Not so much caught as entrapped. That's another part of it, going into someone's private correspondence. Well, I can't say I'm sympathetic towards him, but yes uncomfortable and uneasy about it probably covers it.
 
So the FA have decided that they've pissed around long enough that they can let him off without anyone being too bothered, what a surprise. Ridiculous how long it's taken for them to just let him off.

He'll have a new job in no time, with some old dinosaur chairman stating that he's not been found guilty of anything (other than being a shit manager)

Not according to David Conn:

http://www.theguardian.com/football...alky-mackay-david-iain-moodyconn-racist-texts
 
Not so much caught as entrapped. That's another part of it, going into someone's private correspondence. Well, I can't say I'm sympathetic towards him, but yes uncomfortable and uneasy about it probably covers it.
He's not been entrapped. No one tricked him or encouraged into doing it, so it's not entrapment
 
No, not a great choice of words there. But I was referring to his private messages being trawled through. Not terribly comfortable with that bit. Anyway, as I say, unease and definitely not sympathy.
 
I suspect the vast majority of people have views and thoughts which they would not want to be made public - I know I do - there is no place for thought police nor indeed policing what goes on or is communicated between two people in private
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top