Bluemoon115 said:In taking him off on 30 mins, a cheeky moment turned into a full public confrontation.
SWP's back said:lee-mcfc said:And everyone knows you're a **** so it's all goodSWP's back said:Everyone knows you're a joke.
SWP's back.
Wiw - half a dozen posts without resort to a popcord gif.
Well done you.
(ps - great to call people on an anonylous forum eh)
THISshadygiz said:teddykgb said:and it's just a friendly, so it doesn't matter, but Mancini has to pull him there just to assert control over his team. You let him pull a stunt like that you can't get over him when he inevitably gets himself sent off for a dumb stomp against Sunderland or some dumb situation like that
therefore, he keeps him on and bollocks him in front of everyone in the dressing room....by taking him off mancini has brought more media attention than simply dismissing it and ealing with it in private
bad move imo
No he wasnt.Balotelli the Bison said:The legend of Balotelli grows even more. He should have remained in, it's a friendly and he's one of the people who can do osmething magical at any given moment. Mancini was wrong to take him off!
shadygiz said:teddykgb said:and it's just a friendly, so it doesn't matter, but Mancini has to pull him there just to assert control over his team. You let him pull a stunt like that you can't get over him when he inevitably gets himself sent off for a dumb stomp against Sunderland or some dumb situation like that
therefore, he keeps him on and bollocks him in front of everyone in the dressing room at half time....by taking him off mancini has brought more media attention than simply dismissing it and dealing with it in private
bad move imo
blueshine said:I'm following that cocksucker oliver holt the journalist on twitter,and guess what he never tweeted citys goal,but seconds after balotelli's miss he was all over it,tweeted it instantly.