toffee balls
Well-Known Member
blue_soundwave said:I was just reading through the Guardian's minute by minute commentary of last night's match and was suprised by the level of vitriol and bile aimed towards the club and Mancini. Anyone who regularly listens to Football Weekly will know that Glendenning is no fan of Mancio but this really took it to a new (and surely unprofessional) level.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/jan/05/premier-league-arsenal-manchester-city-live
75 min: [Minute-by-minute reporter clambers on soapbox and clears throat] While I have no particular love for Arsenal, I really hope they win this match because Manchester City's negative tactics are appalling. I know football's a results business, but surely a team assembled at such huge expense has some sort of duty to entertain and try to score a goal at least, if not win. Roberto Mancini's going to have a pain in his shoulder from waving his arm to instruct his players to defy their natural instincts and hang back defending for 90 minutes. He's a disgrace.89 min: Ha ha, you couldn't make this up. From the array of defensive midfielders and defenders on his bench (there are no strikers among City's subs), Mancini sends on Jerome Boateng in place of Carlos Tevez. "Boring, boring City! Boring, boring City!" sing the Emirates crowd, rounding off their sing-song with a chorus of "You're shit and you know you are!" Far be it from me to condone effing and jeffing, but I couldn't disagree with much of that.
90+5 min: Peep! Peep! Peep! It's all over. Arsenal's players walk off shaking their heads in disbelief, while some of City's trudge off to a chorus of boos from the home crowd. They look - dare I say it - embarrassed; Joe Hart certainly does. That was a disgracefully negative and cowardly effort by the world's richest football club. If their die-hard supporters can honestly say they're genuinely happy with that rubbish, they really need to reassess why it is they started going to watch football in the first place.
Remnents of the rag journo's who are still there 30 years after the closure of the original 'Manchester Guardian'
Do not get angry just ignore.