Mancini on Sinclair

Benarbia said:
I want to continue to highlight how badly this kid has been treated, disgusting behaviour
Click to expand...



why not just say mancini out and be done with it
He is not good enough and thats it,nothing against the kid but you have to be very special to break into our ist team,mancini see what he does in training eveyday and how he fits in with the team,we do not
 
I do agree that Sinclair should of got more game time, especially during the times when we were struggling.

However, at the end of the day if Sinclair was pulling up trees in training and proving to be as good as if not better than Silva, Nasri or Tevez there is no doubt that he would have been picked for more first team game time, Mancini would have had no choice.

Plus, you don't have to be a body language expert to watch those Inside City videos on Youtube and whenever he does come on the pitch to see he looks out of place.
 
sam-caddick said:
I do agree that Sinclair should of got more game time, especially during the times when we were struggling.

However, at the end of the day if Sinclair was pulling up trees in training and proving to be as good as if not better than Silva, Nasri or Tevez there is no doubt that he would have been picked for more first team game time, Mancini would have had no choice.

Plus, you don't have to be a body language expert to watch those Inside City videos on Youtube and whenever he does come on the pitch to see he looks out of place.
Click to expand...

To be honest he's looked out of place from the off.

I'm not buying all the 'outrage' at how badly Sinclair has been treated. If he was good enough he would have been played. He wasn't so he hasn't. The end.
 
mancinis treatment of sinclair has been awful.

Despite playing well in training, which is all he could really do he still wasnt given a chance. It doesn't give much hope for players like suarez or rekik. When we werent playing well he could have been brought on and added another dimension and a bit of pace.

he needs to leave to get some game time, cos at swanse he was a good player. I can see him at west brom
 
BobKowalski said:
sam-caddick said:
I do agree that Sinclair should of got more game time, especially during the times when we were struggling.

However, at the end of the day if Sinclair was pulling up trees in training and proving to be as good as if not better than Silva, Nasri or Tevez there is no doubt that he would have been picked for more first team game time, Mancini would have had no choice.

Plus, you don't have to be a body language expert to watch those Inside City videos on Youtube and whenever he does come on the pitch to see he looks out of place.
Click to expand...

To be honest he's looked out of place from the off.

I'm not buying all the 'outrage' at how badly Sinclair has been treated. If he was good enough he would have been played. He wasn't so he hasn't. The end.
Click to expand...

Fair enough but you do realise that the lads cost us £6m+ in fees and will cost us £2'340'000 p/a to keep his place in the reserves warm.
 
Presumably all these losers who think Sinclair has been harshly treated are the same ones claiming Lescott was harshly treated until they appreciated Nastasic.

This is the lescott who nearly cost us the league title v QPR.

Sinclair is shit, Mancini cannot play him.

You're not a good manager if you feel sorry for your players, you have to be ruthless.
 
BobKowalski said:
sam-caddick said:
I do agree that Sinclair should of got more game time, especially during the times when we were struggling.

However, at the end of the day if Sinclair was pulling up trees in training and proving to be as good as if not better than Silva, Nasri or Tevez there is no doubt that he would have been picked for more first team game time, Mancini would have had no choice.

Plus, you don't have to be a body language expert to watch those Inside City videos on Youtube and whenever he does come on the pitch to see he looks out of place.
Click to expand...

To be honest he's looked out of place from the off.

I'm not buying all the 'outrage' at how badly Sinclair has been treated. If he was good enough he would have been played. He wasn't so he hasn't. The end.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Even 5 minutes at the end of a game is enough time to run yourself ragged but instead sometimes Sinclair hasnt even touched the ball ffs
 
NipHolmes said:
BobKowalski said:
sam-caddick said:
I do agree that Sinclair should of got more game time, especially during the times when we were struggling.

However, at the end of the day if Sinclair was pulling up trees in training and proving to be as good as if not better than Silva, Nasri or Tevez there is no doubt that he would have been picked for more first team game time, Mancini would have had no choice.

Plus, you don't have to be a body language expert to watch those Inside City videos on Youtube and whenever he does come on the pitch to see he looks out of place.
Click to expand...

To be honest he's looked out of place from the off.

I'm not buying all the 'outrage' at how badly Sinclair has been treated. If he was good enough he would have been played. He wasn't so he hasn't. The end.
Click to expand...

Fair enough but you do realise that the lads cost us £6m+ in fees and will cost us £2'340'000 p/a to keep his place in the reserves warm.
Click to expand...

Yes but as I said in a different post on a different thread I am not City's CFO so really couldn't care less what he cost or is costing. It ain't my problem. Txiki on the other hand is probably spitting feathers but then it is his problem.

Mind you after RSC and a fair few others Sinclair barely raises a flicker on the 'swing-o-meter' of wasted money
 
BobKowalski said:
NipHolmes said:
BobKowalski said:
To be honest he's looked out of place from the off.

I'm not buying all the 'outrage' at how badly Sinclair has been treated. If he was good enough he would have been played. He wasn't so he hasn't. The end.
Click to expand...

Fair enough but you do realise that the lads cost us £6m+ in fees and will cost us £2'340'000 p/a to keep his place in the reserves warm.
Click to expand...

Yes but as I said in a different post on a different thread I am not City's CFO so really couldn't care less what he cost or is costing. It ain't my problem. Txiki on the other hand is probably spitting feathers but then it is his problem.

Mind you after RSC and a fair few others Sinclair barely raises a flicker on the 'swing-o-meter' of wasted money
Click to expand...

Txiki will need some Zantac alright.

Luckily Bridge, RSC, Kolo and M.Johnson alleviate some pressure.

Sinclair could easily be passed on to Everton. We should do them a deal on the BrightHouse. Sell him for £6million and install a 50p meter under the stairs at Goodison.
 
Did anyone, at any point, last summer when we we're being link with him think "yeh, can see this working out"?

I was baffled when we were being linked with him and was even more baffled when we signed him. He's not good enough and never will be good enough. Not his fault but whoever's bright idea it was to sign him seriously fucked up, whether that be Mancini or Marwood.

Although looking at how rarely Mancini's used him something tells me he didn't want him in the first place and is using him to prove a point about lack of power over transfers or whatever.
 
brian the blue said:
Did anyone, at any point, last summer when we we're being link with him think "yeh, can see this working out"?
Click to expand...

Check the transfer threads from when we signed him mate. "He's only young he will improve", "He'll look better with better players around him" etc. Absolute bollocks. Complete waste
 
To those blaming Mancini for not playing him instead of Silva,Milner,Tevez,Nasri, (year try to make up an excuse for that) must mental, you think Mancini wanted sinclair and its his signing? theres only one peson to blame, Marwood.

Mancini works for the club for us fans and he is obligated to play the best team. not to be nice to rich footballers
 
No problem with Mancini not picking him if he thinks he's not good enough, that's his job. It would be nice though if some of the others who clearly have not been good enough had been treated similarly. As it is Sinclair seems to have been singled out a bit and to me it looks like he wanted to make a point out of stubborness because he was a Marwood signing. I feel sorry for the lad and you'll never convince me that he wasn't worth giving a chance over the winter when we were poor and people like Garcia and Nasri were stinking the place out but getting chance after chance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top