BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 20,264
NipHolmes said:BobKowalski said:sam-caddick said:I do agree that Sinclair should of got more game time, especially during the times when we were struggling.
However, at the end of the day if Sinclair was pulling up trees in training and proving to be as good as if not better than Silva, Nasri or Tevez there is no doubt that he would have been picked for more first team game time, Mancini would have had no choice.
Plus, you don't have to be a body language expert to watch those Inside City videos on Youtube and whenever he does come on the pitch to see he looks out of place.
To be honest he's looked out of place from the off.
I'm not buying all the 'outrage' at how badly Sinclair has been treated. If he was good enough he would have been played. He wasn't so he hasn't. The end.
Fair enough but you do realise that the lads cost us £6m+ in fees and will cost us £2'340'000 p/a to keep his place in the reserves warm.
Yes but as I said in a different post on a different thread I am not City's CFO so really couldn't care less what he cost or is costing. It ain't my problem. Txiki on the other hand is probably spitting feathers but then it is his problem.
Mind you after RSC and a fair few others Sinclair barely raises a flicker on the 'swing-o-meter' of wasted money