Mancini out (Merged)

Re: Mancini out

BillyShears said:
Mancini is a charlatan. A fake. An overhyped moron with an overinflated ego who has been found out time and time and time again since he got here. He wouldn't get a fucking job managing Sunderland, let alone a club with serious ambitions in this league. It's been a nice break from Bluemoon for me and it will continue as long as that piece of shit manager is in charge of our beloved club...

Enjoy Wembley lads....my ticket has gone to someone who gives a shit. I don't.

Close the door on the way out then you knob! Don't give a shit? What kind of blue are you?
I'm in China, set my alarm for 3am to watch a horrible performance; then read you're attention seeking fucking drivel!

I'm flying to UK on thursday and will be at Wembley, because I 'Give a shit' and have done for 45 years.

Next game lads.... Come on City!
 
Re: Mancini out

He will not allow players the freedom to try something on the pitch, ie Johnson on the right, I simply can not remember him on his natural left sided crossing style, with Dzeko in the middle as much as I dislike certain players I'm reluctant to judge them under this pedantic baboon, we scored 5 against the same team WBA scored 3 against away, as a fan for 45 years, I still care or else why the fuck am still on here, but feel it will be the same old same old next week and we wont make the top 4 under this moron Owen Coyle for me, no more foreign shite.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

If we can't get Mourinho it should be Villas Boas, end of discussion.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

won't pretend that I've even seen Portoguese football but I like the thought of Boas, not sure management would make such a radical hire however.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

dmbass said:
We clearly need someone who the players would want to play for, although I think that could be anyone else after this match. The usually proffesional Milner showing his frustration just confirms for me he has to go.

His tactics completely baffle me. I'd seriously take a reallistic Owen Coyle or Martin O'neill once Mancini gets the boot. The players need to be a team and need a manager they can respect, enjoy playing for and who would play them in a tactical set-up which makes sense.
Perhaps it is Milner that needs to go. After doing fuk all, game long he throws a tantrum.
 
Re: Mancini out

I admit it concerns me when he does something mind boggling as playing Milner on the left and then risking Silva and De jong on a lost cause so late on. He really made himself look like an amateur coach tonight and has put heaps of pressure on himself with that performance.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Villa Boas. He'll know what to do with our attacking options. Shit on Balotelli, Dzeko, and Milner all you want, but at the end of the day Mancini is a center back, and organization and cohesion higher up the pitch is lacking. Villa Boas is the man for this job.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

Mourinho would come if he was offered a long term deal that he can walk away from in the middle and get a huge pay off, plus a massive war-chest to bring in the players that suit him.

But gotta be in the CL and i think we need 3rd because we could balls up the qualifying game if we finished 4th tbh.

But please .... no more boring Italians.
 
Re: Who should City get to replace Mancini?

inGavious said:
But please .... no more boring Italians.

I hate this. That's like saying no more English managers because Redknapp bankrupts every team he's ever managed.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.