A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Re: Mancini Thread
No, I said Mancini's team didn't beat Copenhagen. A team they really should've beaten if they had aspirations of qualifying from the group. I then said that this continued a trend because Mancini indeed Mancini struggled with City to beat Ajax last season in a game he also really needed to win. The fact you think that's a dig says far more about you than it does about me.
EDIT:
Also, while we're on the subject. Makes me laugh you trumpeting the "both sides are as bad as each other argument". This thread, and your reaction to my innocuous post, is a testament to that being far from the case.
Skashion said:I must be imagining things but I could have sworn you had a dig at Mancini first on the basis that he'd lost one game. I'm going to continue to defend Mancini, I've been straight up about that since I offered my détente deal. That was the condition, I'll stop bickering with any Outer as long as they don't have digs at Mancini. You did, so I dug back, especially considering your sneering tone about something you were actually completely mistaken on.BillyShears said:Bitterness is also often the cause for someone going looking for arguments on the internet when there's plenty of polite ways to say "think you might be mistaken there".
For the rest, Mancini's group is indeed very tough. He won't get through it IMO. Best of luck to him though unless he comes up against City.
No, I said Mancini's team didn't beat Copenhagen. A team they really should've beaten if they had aspirations of qualifying from the group. I then said that this continued a trend because Mancini indeed Mancini struggled with City to beat Ajax last season in a game he also really needed to win. The fact you think that's a dig says far more about you than it does about me.
EDIT:
Also, while we're on the subject. Makes me laugh you trumpeting the "both sides are as bad as each other argument". This thread, and your reaction to my innocuous post, is a testament to that being far from the case.