A
A
Anonymous
Guest
hgblue said:BillyShears said:hgblue said:Totally agree. Mourinho at PSG is much more preferable to Mourinho at Chelsea. I still haven't figured out why we're not moving heaven and earth to bring him here though. Big mistake imo.
You don't know we're not tbf. Personally I think there's little doubt the conversation will have been had. May not come to anything but I don't see how you canvass for new managers and not talk to the best. Especially when it's apparent he's available. Or going to be. You would rightly have to keep it a water tight secret considering Mancini lost his last job to Mou too.
This is it mate. I can't get my head around why we'd simply stand aside and watch Mourinho rock up at Chelsea. Normally I can see the logic in a course of action, even if I don't agree with it, but this one has me stumped. I cling to the probably faint hope that it suits City and Jose to keep this secret, so the club are happy to see him linked with rival clubs, but it seems far more likely that the decision has been taken that he's not right for us. If this is the case, we will live to regret it imo.
I'm pretty calm about the whole thing. Txiki will know firsthand what it's like having Mourinho in your league. He can see how far behind the rags we are. If Mourinho does go to Chelsea, City will need a huge injection of belief going into next season and IMO that won't come from giving Mancini more time and players. His effect has already been too corrosive on the core of the current squad.