Mangala Confirmed? (not official yet)

BlueiNZ said:
Interesting critique..

<a class="postlink" href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2139822-eliaquim-mangala-is-a-risk-and-a-step-away-from-pellegrinis-transfer-policy?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=epl" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2139 ... mpaign=epl</a>

Nonsense by one of the myriad of know-nothing tits who write for places like GiveMeSport and the BleacherReport, believing that because they got a B- on their English GCSE, they're all journalists in waiting.

The whole article falls apart because it doesn't seem to know that Pellegrini is not in charge of transfers, doesn't have a transfer policy, and some of the players he mentioned were bought before Pellegrini was even the manager.
 
Len Rum said:
FantasyIreland said:
Len Rum said:
In Lidl Eccles today and he cashed in his £5 voucher from the Daily Mirror which entitled him to £5 off his over £45 shop which he'd calculated to perfection at £45.01p. I advised him to travel to the Etihad via Cheetham Hill which has the advantage of avoiding the Mancunian Way.

There is no Lidl in Eccles.....
You're right mate. Eliaquim must have seen your post because he's just been on the blower and reminded me that it was Aldi not Lidl. He was well pleased with the standard of their fruit & veg. When I asked him if he'd signed yet he mumbled something about having to rush off to a party ( I think he said third party, didn't make sense).

Perhaps he said he was off to eat his third pasty?
 
Damocles said:
BlueiNZ said:
Interesting critique..

<a class="postlink" href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2139822-eliaquim-mangala-is-a-risk-and-a-step-away-from-pellegrinis-transfer-policy?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=epl" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2139 ... mpaign=epl</a>

Nonsense by one of the myriad of know-nothing tits who write for places like GiveMeSport and the BleacherReport, believing that because they got a B- on their English GCSE, they're all journalists in waiting.

The whole article falls apart because it doesn't seem to know that Pellegrini is not in charge of transfers, doesn't have a transfer policy, and some of the players he mentioned were bought before Pellegrini was even the manager.


He's right in one very important respect. Mangala would need time. I cant think of any young centre back that has joined a PL club from abroad and not taken time to settle.
 
George Hannah said:
SSN banner currently running a "Sky Sources: Man City Agree Mangala Deal With Porto"
interesting! The plot thickens. Do we get to see the video officially now
 
cibaman said:
Damocles said:
BlueiNZ said:
Interesting critique..

<a class="postlink" href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2139822-eliaquim-mangala-is-a-risk-and-a-step-away-from-pellegrinis-transfer-policy?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=epl" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2139 ... mpaign=epl</a>

Nonsense by one of the myriad of know-nothing tits who write for places like GiveMeSport and the BleacherReport, believing that because they got a B- on their English GCSE, they're all journalists in waiting.

The whole article falls apart because it doesn't seem to know that Pellegrini is not in charge of transfers, doesn't have a transfer policy, and some of the players he mentioned were bought before Pellegrini was even the manager.


He's right in one very important respect. Mangala would need time. I cant think of any young centre back that has joined a PL club from abroad and not taken time to settle.
Nastasic.
 
bluesoup said:
George Hannah said:
SSN banner currently running a "Sky Sources: Man City Agree Mangala Deal With Porto"
interesting! The plot thickens. Do we get to see the video officially now

The one city reckon was never on the website?
 
according to the trustworthy media , the fee for mangala was agreed with porto in january at £32m , its the player who is undecided ,i would give nastasic another chance , still think he has the potential to be a top class centre back , if he can keep injury free this season
 
gmckennasell said:
according to the trustworthy media , the fee for mangala was agreed with porto in january at £32m , its the player who is undecided ,i would give nastasic another chance , still think he has the potential to be a top class centre back , if he can keep injury free this season

Two great feet, 6ft 2", turned 21 end of march, looks classy on the ball, good head and not scared to tackle....sad if we let him go.
No wonder all the big clubs are sniffin him. Here`s my answer to them all....fuck off he`s ours!
 
aguero93:20 said:
cibaman said:
Damocles said:
Nonsense by one of the myriad of know-nothing tits who write for places like GiveMeSport and the BleacherReport, believing that because they got a B- on their English GCSE, they're all journalists in waiting.

The whole article falls apart because it doesn't seem to know that Pellegrini is not in charge of transfers, doesn't have a transfer policy, and some of the players he mentioned were bought before Pellegrini was even the manager.


He's right in one very important respect. Mangala would need time. I cant think of any young centre back that has joined a PL club from abroad and not taken time to settle.
Nastasic.

Beat me to it!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.