They did. It was 2013/14 I think, and it was included because the deal was done around year-end, therefore material. Unless you think the directors provided false information, risking criminal charges, there really isn't any debate about it.I’m not sure about that. The reports that say its 42 also say payments were made to multiple groups over different time periods and that the total was near 42 so I’m not sure that would be easy to spot from one set of accounts not that I’ve seen them. Certainly City didn’t deny it not that that proves much either.
I think only City know for sure but I’m no accountant.