You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Mangala joins Valencia on a Permanent deal
- Thread starter Damanino
- Start date
roy.or.r
Well-Known Member
Maybe we should try him as a goalie against lower teams. Because, you know, they hardly have any shot at our goal and he won't have to move at all.
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 27,960
How the fuck can we not get shut on a free?!
Trojan1962
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2018
- Messages
- 3,063
His wages are a problem for clubs to buy him. Once his deal finishes at City I think clubs will come in for him. The lad has had a terrible time here.
birchwoodgingerste
Well-Known Member
So we gave him a new deal and done ourselves over!His wages are a problem for clubs to buy him. Once his deal finishes at City I think clubs will come in for him. The lad has had a terrible time here.
Trojan1962
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2018
- Messages
- 3,063
I think it was a failed attempt to get something for him and to get him fully fit. Easier to sell a player who doesn’t have an injury. Unfortunately it’s not worked. Regarding the finances it’s not my money so couldn’t careless
I think it was a failed attempt to get something for him and to get him fully fit. Easier to sell a player who doesn’t have an injury. Unfortunately it’s not worked. Regarding the finances it’s not my money so couldn’t careless
Sounds plausible. We probably ran the numbers and thought that we could sell him more than the remainder of his contract is worth (extension included), but yeah, obviously didn't work if so.
I think regardless of wages the club still has a problem selling players, in that we don't position ourselves well enough. We've become shifty enough buying, it's just the other half still lagging.
colesy
Well-Known Member
Sounds plausible. We probably ran the numbers and thought that we could sell him more than the remainder of his contract is worth (extension included), but yeah, obviously didn't work if so.
I think regardless of wages the club still has a problem selling players, in that we don't position ourselves well enough. We've become shifty enough buying, it's just the other half still lagging.
It's probably because they are our cast offs really, I can't recall us selling anyone in their prime, which is why we cannot expect great fees.
Maybe they’ve all seen him play. He’s just not worth the wages they’d have to match so it doesn’t matter he’d cost nout.How the fuck can we not get shut on a free?!