Pablo ZZZ Peroni said:OB1 said:Just finished watching the TV coverage of the Derby and I am even more convinced that the subs had very little to do with how City played in the latter stages of the game. I think the more significant event was the run by Rooney that led to the Rags second and final shot on target, which required a fine save from Hart. I think that close shave made City realise the game was not over and induced a serious case of the jitters.
What did not happen, as I pointed out earlier, was a flood of successful attacks down our left flank because Milner was not there. And whoever covered the left flank ahead of Clichy, be it Dzeko or Nasri, continued to keep tabs on Valencia and neither Valencia nor Di Maria made any notable progress down their right after the 75th minute - check their dashboards for confirmation.
Exactly. Just done the same thing and reached the same conclusion.
The Milner substitution was strange, at the time I thought he must have picked up a knock. But I didnt think the substitutions overall were a key factor in the way the game changed.
I just thought we were overcome by collective indecision as to whether to stick or twist. Usually in the last twenty mins at the Etihad we're going for it. Trying to turn 1-0's into 4-0's rather than sitting on a lead. And against a 10 man team with a makeshift back 4 our natural inclination would be to go for the jugular. But when United came back at us it seemed to unnerve the players. We didnt seem to know whether to go for the second goal or sit on the lead and ended up doing neither.