Marc Cucurella

[Boo or Boo-urns]

Yanks, overpaid, over-indebted and over here!

 

[Sibierskii]

62 big ones damn, bet you if he didn't have that haircut he'd be half the price

 

[5 Hit Gibbon]

As others have said the fee was far too high. Move on to the next target.

 

[Coatigan]

Even The Athletic’s Chelsea correspondent has said “Cucurella is costing considerably more than £52.5m”.

Hope it sticks out there as much and as quickly as it has here. Was just surprised, given Romano was the only one with those numbers. And also found it a bit hypocritical of BM, that's all.

 

[argyle]

As others have said the fee was far too high. Move on to the next target.

...if there is a next target this summer.

 

[johnnytapia]

It really isn’t.

If it weren’t, they (Brighton) wouldn’t have got it . It is. And they did.

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

Doesn't matter what Chelsea paid, what City thought he was worth is all that matters and I'm satisfied that Pep decided he was worth no more than £40m to our team.

Lets be honest Pep knows more about football and our team than all of us on here combined.

 

[DMA's]

I was one of the biggest fans of cucurella but even I can accept that the price Chelsea have paid is too high. Wow

 

[Coatigan]

A claimed £62m, plus a player on loan. Chelsea not holding out.

The scenes, when we sell them Ake for a mere £41m next week.

And the clappers argue it is a great deal.

 

[Ric]

Hope it sticks out there as much and as quickly as it has here. Was just surprised, given Romano was the only one with those numbers. And also found it a bit hypocritical of BM, that's all.

I haven’t really seen any journalists still saying £52.5m tonight?