Sleeping_Easy
Well-Known Member
MCFC-alan88 said:Falcao to Chelsea, Balotelli to Monaco? Scary thought process.
Hope this isn't right. Would make chelsea a much better side in the second half of the season.
MCFC-alan88 said:Falcao to Chelsea, Balotelli to Monaco? Scary thought process.
Billy he proved you wrong. Move on. Get over it. If not for your own sake for the rest of us.BillyShears said:Mario, Mino, and Monaco. A match made in (money) heaven. All that's missing is Mancini!
Gaylord du Bois said:Billy he proved you wrong. Move on. Get over it. If not for your own sake for the rest of us.BillyShears said:Mario, Mino, and Monaco. A match made in (money) heaven. All that's missing is Mancini!
Its old, cold and full of mould mate.
You understand how an option on a contract operates, don't you? No compulsion is imposed on the contracting party. Commercial organisations secure them all the time - "just in case" clauses. They are there to provide for what might happen rather than what will. I expect the circumstances that the club envisaged might occur when including that clause in their terms of sale of Mario to Milan haven't remotely manifested themselves.Dzekolol said:TCIB said:I will wager 500 quid right now that Balo never plays for us whilst Pellegrini is manager and Ferran and Txiki over see the club.
Manchester City have secured a first refusal buy-back option as part of the €23 million sale of Mario Balotelli to AC Milan, Goal.com can reveal.
I have no idea why Txiki failed to consult TCIB before securing this option. Meh
Txiki would be wise not to ignore TCIB and consult with him before making such an important decisions.
Gaylord du Bois said:Billy he proved you wrong. Move on. Get over it. If not for your own sake for the rest of us.BillyShears said:Mario, Mino, and Monaco. A match made in (money) heaven. All that's missing is Mancini!
Its old, cold and full of mould mate.
BillyShears said:Gaylord du Bois said:Billy he proved you wrong. Move on. Get over it. If not for your own sake for the rest of us.BillyShears said:Mario, Mino, and Monaco. A match made in (money) heaven. All that's missing is Mancini!
Its old, cold and full of mould mate.
Haha. Tell me I'm wrong mate. Mario to Monaco. Yes it's plausible with Mino as his agent. Mancini to Monaco. Yes it's plausible as he nearly joined them once already. Money is the primary motivator in those moves. Well obviously.
MCFC-alan88 said:Balotelli won't go to Chelsea. Not a chance in hell, not because he wouldn't but because Mourinho wouldn't have him. Say what you like about Jose, but he doesn't suffer fools, and Mario is definitely that.
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:BillyShears said:Gaylord du Bois said:Billy he proved you wrong. Move on. Get over it. If not for your own sake for the rest of us.
Its old, cold and full of mould mate.
Haha. Tell me I'm wrong mate. Mario to Monaco. Yes it's plausible with Mino as his agent. Mancini to Monaco. Yes it's plausible as he nearly joined them once already. Money is the primary motivator in those moves. Well obviously.
Yeah but mario won't play for Mancini!!!
No mate its the constant Mancini references that appear to be becoming your Freudian footnote.BillyShears said:Gaylord du Bois said:Billy he proved you wrong. Move on. Get over it. If not for your own sake for the rest of us.BillyShears said:Mario, Mino, and Monaco. A match made in (money) heaven. All that's missing is Mancini!
Its old, cold and full of mould mate.
Haha. Tell me I'm wrong mate. Mario to Monaco. Yes it's plausible with Mino as his agent. Mancini to Monaco. Yes it's plausible as he nearly joined them once already. Money is the primary motivator in those moves. Well obviously.