Daz_Blue
Well-Known Member
Off to Fiorentina according to twitter .....
oppa gangnam style said:If he would be played like Dzeko by Mancini, like coming deep a lot, trying to build attacks instead only being the end of crosses from Ribery, Robben, Lahm etc then he would suffer so much more than Dzeko here.
If we plan to change tactics that could be useful for a type of player like Gomez then we can keep Dzeko and will does the job very well.
I mean there is a reason Chelsea could after Dzeko or Dortmund. (Mourinho, Klopp wants him, there is a reason why...)
Selling Dzeko, getting Cavani fair, but for Gomez?
Daz_Blue said:EalingBlue2 said:Everyone says we want Cavani because the tabloids say so and Mancini mentioned it - does anyone know for a fact? Everyone said we wanted Falcao too ?
I was thinking that the other day....was Cavani a Mancini target only ?
BlueMoonoverUS said:@JanAageFjortoft: Lewandowski to stay!!!
Consequences:
- Gomez must stay
- Dzeko not to Germany
SergioInAddedTime said:BlueMoonoverUS said:@JanAageFjortoft: Lewandowski to stay!!!
Consequences:
- Gomez must stay
- Dzeko not to Germany
As a fellow norwegian, I have to say that Fjørtoft thinks he knows more than he do.
yeah im trying to weigh up whether him and kun could work up front together as in would he stop kun from playing his best however he scores for fun which you cant argue with however with the creative talent that could be at city next season i cannot see it hindering kun im all for itjohnmc said:He would score from the chances we create. No messing about, ball in net, back to the half way line. Big problem last year was converting chances and he would do that. But thats all he would do. Which isnt a bad thing as such but as with Gomez at Bayern, Berbatov at the rags etc sometimes teams want more.
Id be happy with him.
Ray78 said:Gomez would not be all that bad if the price is right. I don't think Dzeko is that interested in playing for City so there is no point in keeping him.
That's a downgrade on what we have.TonyM said:I like him. I think he could be more disciplined than Dzeko and stay forward and central. This will help commit defenders so the wide attackers can get behind. Gomez will just tap them in tmie and time again. I bet he'd miss as much as our currect strikers (maybe more) but if he is in the right place more often than not he'll score plenty.
I wouldn't be upset if we swapped Dzeko for him and got in an other younger striker as further backup, e.g. Morata :-)
Aguero, Gomez, Morata, Guidetti is a fine set of strikers.
green pennies said:Ray78 said:Gomez would not be all that bad if the price is right. I don't think Dzeko is that interested in playing for City so there is no point in keeping him.
Anything to back up this assertion? Regardless of your opinion on him (and god knows there are some negative ones), the guy has had a pretty good attitude and has been very pro-team from what I have seen, especially taking into account that Mancini turned him into a bench player. He seems very open minded about meeting Pelle and seeing if he can make this work.
Dzeko the player can be frustrating, but Dzeko the person seems to make the best out of things when it comes to his outlook, no?
But anyway, this is a Gomez thread and most of us are sick of the Dzeko stuff, so on to him: I think he'd clean up the garbage in front and get a lot of goals. Still don't know that losing a certain Bosnian and getting him is an "upgrade" though.