Mario, time to say goodbye?

I'd keep him for now, and next season, however I'd expect us to have a decent fourth striker so that his petulance can't cost us too heavily.
 
samharris said:
bluevengence said:
Who needs enemies eh....the shit Wooney has pulled
on and off the pitch over the years,worse than anything Mario has
ever done...but we don`t hear the rags wanting to fook him off,oh no,they
close ranks and get behind their player...some blues would rather hang ours in
public.

And dont get me started on that 500 page thread on RAWK called " Lets get rid of Suarez,the racist ****"..
Good points.
 
Completely disagree.

Firstly, this country loves an eccentric. Secondly, the reason he moved to England in the first place was because the Italian fans literally tried to kill him because he was black. His development stopped in Italy and the racism brought out his nasty side. This stamping and fouling isn't something he has always done, it stems directly from Juve fans.

Thirdly, that Cantona guy who had similar disciplinary problems seemed to do ok here.

I don't think you have thought your argument through.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
mcfc1632 said:
I might be open to criticism for not being remotely arsed to read any of this thread - just posting to add my opinion to what (I assume) must be the over-whelming view of CITY fans that this is a spectacularly stupid thread totally missing the opinion of fans

And to start a stupid thread at a stupid time can (IMO) only be attention seeking - wonder if the OP is someone that also moans (rightly) about the press bias - they do not need to get at CITY when we have our own fans doing it

The only thing "stupid" or "embarrassing" are the people having a go at Tolmie's Hairdoo for asking a totally valid, relevant and interesting question.

I bet any of you that this conversation is had between the board and the manager this week, if it hasn't already. Don't see The Sheikh going "Ah well. He's young. Gotta love Mario" if he loses us the fucking title with a spit or a kick or a grab.

I'd keep him for the moment, but I think the thread is the most relevant issue of today for any City fan with the ability to reason beyond 140 characters.
Spot on.
 
lee-mcfc said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
redmizzle said:
It's obvious he likes starting controversial threads for the attention.


I wouldn't expect either you to have understood the actual thread.

Between you, over 25,000 posts.

Do the irony!
Yes because having so many posts determines if you understand a thread or not...

you attention seeker


Let me know when you understand one.

Get back under your Man City quilt, it's still daylight.

I await with trepidation your ritual abuse of somebody's mam.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
lee-mcfc said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I wouldn't expect either you to have understood the actual thread.

Between you, over 25,000 posts.

Do the irony!
Yes because having so many posts determines if you understand a thread or not...

you attention seeker

Leave it out mate - you clearly haven't understood the thread. He asks a valid question - is Mario's reputation making his position at the club untenable?

It's been answered and the answer is no. Or is that answer incorrect?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.