citytill1die84
Well-Known Member
Never wanted him anyway.
Nobody is stating otherwise, everyone including myself is saying although they may get another DM and improve there overall squad, that won’t solve there lack of goals, they need a striker more than a DM.He is better and younger than Partey. He is a definitely a good get if he performs to his level. I don't understand why so many are pretending otherwise.
My point has nothing to do with us. Im just pointing out that a good player can be good even if he does not join usCorrect me if I'm wrong but wasn't this almost word for word what people were saying about Merino who has now been relegated to 3rd choice (4th if Partey extends), a guy that many of here were calling one of the best moves of the window and couldn't believe we didn't try for him
Can't say I've seen enough of Zubimendi to know just how good he is, and yea its frustrating why we haven't bought a DM yet but there are plenty of DMs out there for us still to target
Would be more worried if Arsenal had jsut bought a proper CF rather than another CM
Frustrating rather than devastating, not because Zubimendi specifically more because we haven't found "someone" whoever that someone is
Merino is the Spanish Soucek.Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't this almost word for word what people were saying about Merino who has now been relegated to 3rd choice (4th if Partey extends), a guy that many of here were calling one of the best moves of the window and couldn't believe we didn't try for him
Can't say I've seen enough of Zubimendi to know just how good he is, and yea its frustrating why we haven't bought a DM yet but there are plenty of DMs out there for us still to target
Would be more worried if Arsenal had jsut bought a proper CF rather than another CM
Frustrating rather than devastating, not because Zubimendi specifically more because we haven't found "someone" whoever that someone is
Would you say the same argument applies to our 3 pending additions too?Already acknowledged hes younger and fitter. Is he actually better? Partey is very good when he's fit, if he is better, it's an incremental upgrade, its much easier and cheaper to upgrade elsewhere and get more improvement. I didn't say it wasn't a good get, i think he is, he just doesn't improve them, simply a younger replacement.
Perhaps he doesn't want ro be an understudy for both club and Country.I kind of wonder why clubs haven't been falling over themselves to sign him. We're in a position where we need someone to act as an understudy to Rodri and the player that literally does that for Spain is available with a release clause, but we haven't gone for it. That suggests to me that perhaps he's not the great bargain everyone seems to think based on his performances in the Euros. I can't say I watch Spanish football, but I've watched enough international tournaments to know never to sign someone based on their performances for their country.
Only seen him play once, last night against Villarreal. Saw cannot make a true assessment.I kind of wonder why clubs haven't been falling over themselves to sign him. We're in a position where we need someone to act as an understudy to Rodri and the player that literally does that for Spain is available with a release clause, but we haven't gone for it. That suggests to me that perhaps he's not the great bargain everyone seems to think based on his performances in the Euros. I can't say I watch Spanish football, but I've watched enough international tournaments to know never to sign someone based on their performances for their country.
My logic is that no-one knows Spanish football better than our staff, and they're not going for him, which says a lot.Only seen him play once, last night against Villarreal. Saw cannot make a true assessment.
Sociedad won 1-0, but wasn't really aware of him.
Gut feeling, he is too lightweight for the Premier League and not good enough for City.
Free kicks are given frequently in La Liga, that would be seen as a robust challenge in the Premier League.
Not the answer I feel...
Fair enough...My logic is that no-one knows Spanish football better than our staff, and they're not going for him, which says a lot.
I’ve only seen him when he came on for Rodri and he looked okay. My view is Spain play him as a Rodri back up and not alongside Rodri. That isn’t what we need and it’s also not what Zubimendi needs either.Only seen him play once, last night against Villarreal. Saw cannot make a true assessment.
Sociedad won 1-0, but wasn't really aware of him.
Gut feeling, he is too lightweight for the Premier League and not good enough for City.
Free kicks are given frequently in La Liga, that would be seen as a robust challenge in the Premier League.
Not the answer I feel...
Yes, absolutely. Anyone who thinks a 17/18 Yr old CB is going to be soon (or he's currently even close) an upgrade on our current CB's is on crack. Same with the bloke from Lens....who 99.9% of people had to Google to find out who he is (the 0.1% who had heard of him play 'xbox fifa')Would you say the same argument applies to our 3 pending additions too?
Well no because they're not remotely similar circumstances and not comparable. You can perhaps say Marmoush is a direct replacement for Alvarez 6 months later i suppose, but the circumstances obviously arent the same. Alvarez wanted out and we'll end up spending roughly the same overall. The other targets are raw youngsters coming in to bolster a squad that should never have been this thin to begin with. Again, not the same thing.Would you say the same argument applies to our 3 pending additions too?
Very good signing for arsenal and one that we should have been on. Also even though I’m happy with these supposed transfers I’m still perplexed that the one we really need a defensive mid is one we are not being linked with because our midfield is still slow and won’t get any faster in the second half of the season.Yes, absolutely. Anyone who thinks a 17/18 Yr old CB is going to be soon (or he's currently even close) an upgrade on our current CB's is on crack. Same with the bloke from Lens....who 99.9% of people had to Google to find out who he is (the 0.1% who had heard of him play 'xbox fifa')
....and suddenly, someone who no one took any notice of in Germany, is a guaranteed upgrade on Foden/Savinho/Doku/Bernado ;)
Zubamendi is a better signing by miles...unless one of our 3 surprise everybody.
I wasn't asking of ot eas the same thing, rather i was asking if the same argument applies. Let me explain:Well no because they're not remotely similar circumstances and not comparable. You can perhaps say Marmoush is a direct replacement for Alvarez 6 months later i suppose, but the circumstances obviously arent the same. Alvarez wanted out and we'll end up spending roughly the same overall. The other targets are raw youngsters coming in to bolster a squad that should never have been this thin to begin with. Again, not the same thing.