Match of the Day - 2019/20

[blueinsa]

Not every bit of contact should be deemed as a foul and a penalty, anywhere else on the pitch the challenge is irrelevant, too many players now trying to con the refs by just falling over when they lose the ball or are looking to get an undeserved penalty.

I'm commenting on the narratives the media/PiGMOB/Dermot the spin doctor spins dependant on who is involved.

I agree btw that not every bit of contact is a foul but fuck it, if it good enough to constantly award penalties to Salah and Mane then its good enough for us...............except it seemingly isnt..............why is that?.................anyone?

 

[Ric]

It looked a definite penalty at the time. Did VAR even review it?

 

[ballinio]

It’s the bbc , i’m Surprised they show us at all . Goebbels would be proud of this organisation.

 

[Northblue]

It looked a definite penalty at the time. Did VAR even review it?

Didn’t see VAR check in progress on the screens, but the ball didn’t go out of play for a while after the incident.

So as is the answer to most of our questions Around VAR - who the fuck knows?

 

[hammocity]

I'm commenting on the narratives the media/PiGMOB/Dermot the spin doctor spins dependant on how is involved.

I agree btw that not every bit of contact is a foul but fuck it, if it good enough to constantly award penalties to Salah and mane then its good enough for us...............except it seemingly isnt..............why is that?.................anyone?

Agree, but the “diving” issue is being condoned by the media by saying there was “contact” but that alone should not be the criteria for giving a penalty. It should be contact that clearly means a penalty, not the slightest touch, it’s a cheats charter.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

It’s the bbc , i’m Surprised they show us at all . Goebbels would be proud of this organisation.

Goebbels could not have dreamt of an organization like the BBC has become. He would have loved 'em!

 

[TheRemainsOfTheDave]

It looked a definite penalty at the time. Did VAR even review it?

If only there was a tv show that reviewed the matches and all of the action of interest in each game that took place that day, with people who had played the game partaking in discussion about such matters.

 

[ballinio]

Goebbels could not have dreamt of an organization like the BBC has become. He would have loved 'em!

He would & the fact we have to pay for their bullshit as well.

 

[blueinsa]

Agree, but the “diving” issue is being condoned by the media by saying there was “contact” but that alone should not be the criteria for giving a penalty. It should be contact that clearly means a penalty, not the slightest touch, it’s a cheats charter.

Its not just the media though, its PiGMOB and Dermot the Twat on a Monday after saying correct decision.

We have no chance, the game has no chance whilst its being managed by bent ****s.

Agents and certain players along with their managers and clubs have realised that they can be favoured by many of them and in a professional game they where always going to use that advantage and bookies are more than happy to join in on the fix and money making opportunity.

 

[blueinsa]

If only there was a tv show that reviewed the matches and all of the action of interest in each game that took place that day, with people who had played the game partaking in discussion about such matters.

We know the answer now.

Dermot will say ref has called it right and that its such a great example of why VAR is brilliant because they have agreed with the ref. He will say there is contact but not enough in his opinion for the lad to go down or for it to be a penalty and he will say not all contact is a foul blah blah blah....................