The BBC it seems have went all in on the red scousers after today’s match,hopefully it’s nothing but crying and wailing by may.Apologies on the early shout for match of the day, not sure where they've found 30mins for that Liverpool-Chelsea game.
Not difficult is itBBC's pundits far more level-headed than Sky's.
30 minutes for the Dippers 21 minute for City. 2 Dipper pundits no City punditsThe BBC it seems have went all in on the red scousers after today’s match,hopefully it’s nothing but crying and wailing by may.
1 ex-Liverpool player. 1 ex-Liverpool manager.30 minutes for the Dippers 21 minute for City. 2 Dipper pundits no Cty pundits
Commonly known as the Bruno Fernandez gambit.They were criticising the Wolves players for NOT arguing with the referee after Stones scored. This after they all agreed it was the correct decision to allow the goal.
Precisely what difference could it possibly have made given the involvement of VAR and why on earth would they encourage players to argue with the ref?
From now on kids if a decision goes against you even if it's correct don't forget to immediately start arguing with the ref?!!!!