cleavers
Moderator
However they might be winners at this level, not many of them make it at Chelsea full time.Chelsea develop winners as well as good footballers
However they might be winners at this level, not many of them make it at Chelsea full time.Chelsea develop winners as well as good footballers
However they might be winners at this level, not many of them make it at Chelsea full time.
However they might be winners at this level, not many of them make it at Chelsea full time.
Most men finish having growth spurts by the age of 18. Some of our lads would have to have a serious growth spurt to end up much bigger than they are now.
I didn't say they don't pick talent though did I, read it how you like, I couldn't give a f**k, the Chelsea players are physically stronger, talented obviously, and play more as a team, they did it last year, they've done it in both legs of this final. We certainly have talent, but its not enough as this game has clearly shown.No you literally did say they picked physicality over talent, you might not have meant that, but I can only reply to what you write not what you mean.
Your positivity is contagious throughout this forum. Keep up the good work.Let's see what we produce. Apart from the odd game no prospect has broke through for us recently.
Talk of us spending between 250-350m gross ain't gonna develop no one.