Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
Now that's the truthThey criticizes bc it’s not consistent. If it was Liverpool for example it wouldn’t even be a pk
Now that's the truthThey criticizes bc it’s not consistent. If it was Liverpool for example it wouldn’t even be a pk
Sorry sir the red wasn't harsh - he was last man and denying a goal scoring opportunity.Cancelo gave the ref an oppertunity, rank bad defending, red card harsh but it was a penalty
Nope, it's always better to let the player through and compete with 11Cancelo stands off and they score, and you all talk about him being too soft, I guarantee. Had to attempt for a challenge, he went for a shoulder to shoulder. Ref saw it as a pen. Wouldn't call it unfortunate but it wasn't "braindead" ffs.
I understand, but I'm leaning more towards shoulder to the back of the player. The part I'm most puzzled about is their opinion that it's a pen, but red is harsh. You must give a red according to LOTG.I know the rules but thought it was shoulder to shoulder within playing distance if the ball and no foul.
Yeah when we didn't have him 1v1 at the back...thats the point. He's only good going forward.You are dumb if you don’t think that. Plenty games last season where he was out best player.
double jeopardy? this is football not crown courtBut blue tinted glasses, which I own myself, can't ignore the actual laws of the game. This double jeopardy rule is not open to interpretation like many of the other laws are.
No but whether it was or wasn’t a foul is subjective.But blue tinted glasses, which I own myself, can't ignore the actual laws of the game. This double jeopardy rule is not open to interpretation like many of the other laws are.
He's one of the better players in the airAke's lack of height is always a problem and today it cost us dear.
Laporte would have headed that clear with ease