Match Thread | Manchester City vs Chelsea (03/12/16)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Another match where we can't beat a top 4 site, you know what...I think there is no doubting the ability of some of our so called stars however the extra little you need...guts, bottle are not there in some of them...hence we keep ending up down in games like this
 
no i only saw your reply when i logged back on after the goal..id even already posted before i replied to you....

I said before the game with the line up that we would hugely struggle defensively and we have. Ive been saying for weeks that Ottomendi dives in all over the place and isn't good enough....that the fullbacks need replacing to play how Pep wants them to (and then to play two players at wing back who are so poor in that area is laughable)

Kolarov is a liability and hasn't got the pace to play this way either......and so it has been proved AGAIN!

Keep your head in the sand all you want but Im right. Pep needs to look at his personnel before deciding on his system(s)......we don't have the players to play in some of the ways he wants....

Ottomendi, Navas Kolarov are all liabilities on a weekly basis....increasingly so with Ottomendi

Go back and check my comments int he pre match thread if you think i am just reacting to your post......you will see you are wrong

Cant be arsed as you're so boring to read.
 
KDB and Aguero are as much at fault as Bravo and Otomendi.

Always missing chance after chance.

KDB i agree

But if we give away goals week in week out cause of our defending then that is what has to be looked at....we don't concede we don't lose....Ottomendi is an increasing liability
 
Conte is doing a fine job at the Chavs, none of that 1st season settling in boll*cks for him
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.