Cheltblue
Well-Known Member
Thatchersforearm said:
Have to agree, a very heart warming read.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
maths with the glaziers
- Thread starter Chris in London
- Start date
Have to agree, a very heart warming read.
Dave S
Well-Known Member
Very interesting thread, and totally uplifting. It's made my day.
The problem for the Glaziers is that even though someone will always be interested in buying United the higher the debt raises the less lucrative it looks to buyers. So even if they have a great brand name and blablabla if the debt is enormous there is no way anyone would want to buy as it means taking over a great deal of debt and that means you'd have to earn alot for many years before seing any return on your investment.
Look at liverpool, the arabs didnt want to go into that club because of debt and I believe United are worse off than liverpool (dont have anything to back this up other than a general feeling:-)
However if they were to go bankrupt and wipe out all dept the potential investors would be lined up.
Look at liverpool, the arabs didnt want to go into that club because of debt and I believe United are worse off than liverpool (dont have anything to back this up other than a general feeling:-)
However if they were to go bankrupt and wipe out all dept the potential investors would be lined up.
Bluemoonbaldboy
Well-Known Member
Simple they honestly thought they could get out of the joint agreement for TV rights. Once they had all rag home games would then be shown Pay Per View here and internationally. If that happened they would have made millions a season and paid off the debt without committing a penny of their own money thus getting a cash cow for free. Same as Hicks and Gillett at the Dippers, problem is the Premier League believe in the joint agreement as it means smaller teams get a fair share of the pie if however it was each club owned their own rights can you seriously see Burnley v Stoke getting many PPV buys?allan harper said:so why did the yanks buy the shit hole?
they must be making profit on there investment or why else would they have bought the shit hole
Phil.mcfc
Well-Known Member
The thing what always gets on my tits is when the rags say, '' Yeah but its the glaziers dept not the clubs, so when they leave were fine'' is that true?
Phil.mcfc said:The thing what always gets on my tits is when the rags say, '' Yeah but its the glaziers dept not the clubs, so when they leave were fine'' is that true?
No, it's the club that owes the money.
mike channon´s windmill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2008
- Messages
- 7,475
When we dim the lights before the match we should have this running total flashing on the scoreboard, changing by the second - maybe someone could photoshop an example of how it might look - sweet!
Phil.mcfc said:The thing what always gets on my tits is when the rags say, '' Yeah but its the glaziers dept not the clubs, so when they leave were fine'' is that true?
My rag mate says they are fucked. Plenty of talk on redcafe about this... Some journo has just been on talkshite too, according to him the debt is out of control and there are serious problems.... Does make me laugh that the MEUN are still linking them with David Silva and David Vill....
Phil.mcfc
Well-Known Member
Cheers for that lads.
Bluemoonbaldboy
Well-Known Member
It is laughable especially Villa rags announced they would only buy players below 26 or if their resale value would be higher at 28 and given a 4 or 5 year contract how could they make money on him.vincent said:My rag mate says they are fucked. Plenty of talk on redcafe about this... Some journo has just been on talkshite too, according to him the debt is out of control and there are serious problems.... Does make me laugh that the MEUN are still linking them with David Silva and David Vill....