City have more goals from substitutes than any team in the league. In fact, we're 30% more than our closest rivals of Everton and around 50% ahead of Manchester United.
Proportionally however, 16.4% of our goals came from substitutes putting us fourth in the league behind Moyes' Everton on a massive 20% (1 in every 5 goals comes from a sub!), Lambert's Norwich with 17.4%, and Hughes' QPR with a close 17%. United had a measley 8% of their goals from substitutes.
The lowest was Fulham, who only managed a single goal all year from a sub, or 2.3% of their total goals.
The interesting question is what exactly this tells us about the teams. Do they have good squads? Are they more determined? Do they leave it late? Is it a boon for their managers? Is it a sign that their managers were found out? Ideally, I can cross reference this later with exactly what situation the teams were in when the sub goals were scored. Of course, some players might have gone off for fitness and injury reasons instead of a tactical change. More data is needed before analysis but that Everton stat is pretty shocking.
Most of the "big teams" of Chelsea, Liverpool, Spurs, United and Arsenal are floating in the 8-10% range rather than our 16.4%.
EDIT: By the way, if anybody has any questions that they would like investigating statistically, then I'd be happy to have a go for you.