A post on this from elsewhere:
"Can I just explain the truth of this as the BBC has forgot to add bits in. There was always going to be restructure of the WSL after the first three years, the restructure meant that there would be a two tier league WSL 1 and WSL 2. All teams in England were invited to bid to take part in gaining entry to the two leagues. This ended with a presentation to the FA. All teams had the same opportunity to put there case forward that included infrastructure, facilities, finances etc. We all thought we were heading to WSL 2 but the FA decided that WSL 1 was the league they wanted City in. This was the FAs decision not City's ,the FAs.
City bid has coincided with the women's team moving with the men's teams etc over to the new training complex. The teams home games will played on the new site in an new purpose built stadium. What were City meant to do when asked to do a presentation, lie about things. We have an amazing base and infrastructure what I believe will take City ladies team to the very top in this country. People say the English premier league is dominated by one team or the Scottish well the women's game is the same in the UK, Arsenal win 90% of the majors in this country, isn't it about time their supremency was challenged?? There are major changes ahead for City ladies and its likely that a lot of the people involved now will no longer be there but in the long run this team will challenge for major honurs in the women's game. I am confident of that."