Media bias against City

Status
Not open for further replies.
Warning - suggest any pro agenderists avoid Ian Herbert's Saturday anti city bile about FFP in the independent. Don't bother to give it the click bait, in summary it's a wishful thinking scenario by Rag bastard Herbert whereby only new owners would have FFP relaxed do it wouldn't count in City's favour. Pathetic piece of journalism as always. I posted a link to the article on Twitter @mikejl67 - I'd suggest sending the dick a message on Twitter rather than Giving the Indy ad revenues - @ianherbs if you're interested
 
Mikejl said:
Warning - suggest any pro agenderists avoid Ian Herbert's Saturday anti city bile about FFP in the independent. Don't bother to give it the click bait, in summary it's a wishful thinking scenario by Rag bastard Herbert whereby only new owners would have FFP relaxed do it wouldn't count in City's favour. Pathetic piece of journalism as always. I posted a link to the article on Twitter @mikejl67 - I'd suggest sending the dick a message on Twitter rather than Giving the Indy ad revenues - @ianherbs if you're interested
Click to expand...

Rubbish.

He's reporting suggestions that when UEFA debate the subject in a couple of weeks they will only allow greater FFP flexibility for new owners, to facilitate investment in clubs such as AC and Inter. Those rumours have been around recently, reported in other papers, its exactly the sort of thing you can expect from UEFA.

There's no suggestion from Herbert that he believes that this is the right thing to do. The article also includes comments that it could well be illegal.

Its a perfectly reasonable article on a subject that should be of concern to City fans. Indeed, if it had not been reported it would raise the question as to why the press are suppressing articles about actions being planned by UEFA which would be deterimental to City
 
cibaman said:
Rubbish.

He's reporting suggestions that when UEFA debate the subject in a couple of weeks they will only allow greater FFP flexibility for new owners, to facilitate investment in clubs such as AC and Inter. Those rumours have been around recently, reported in other papers, its exactly the sort of thing you can expect from UEFA.

There's no suggestion from Herbert that he believes that this is the right thing to do. The article also includes comments that it could well be illegal.

Its a perfectly reasonable article on a subject that should be of concern to City fans. Indeed, if it had not been reported it would raise the question as to why the press are suppressing articles about actions being planned by UEFA which would be deterimental to City
Click to expand...
That's how I read it as well. I thought I was a Rag for a while there!
 
Not rubbish and not an agenda, however Herbert is a rag & loves putting a negative slant on a story about us. Re FFP (in another forum tbh) restriction of trade and will get kicked out by the courts eventually, UEFA is about as bent as FIFA & the FFP is only being relaxed to appease Berlusconi
 
cibaman said:
Rubbish.

He's reporting suggestions that when UEFA debate the subject in a couple of weeks they will only allow greater FFP flexibility for new owners, to facilitate investment in clubs such as AC and Inter. Those rumours have been around recently, reported in other papers, its exactly the sort of thing you can expect from UEFA.

There's no suggestion from Herbert that he believes that this is the right thing to do. The article also includes comments that it could well be illegal.

Its a perfectly reasonable article on a subject that should be of concern to City fans. Indeed, if it had not been reported it would raise the question as to why the press are suppressing articles about actions being planned by UEFA which would be deterimental to City
Click to expand...

In a nutshell.

I had to read the article a few times to be sure, as having read Mikejl comments and those on the FFP thread you would have thought it was open season on the club.

I will look forward to reading Martin Samuels comments on this, as he was ahead of the game highlighting FFP stopped the aspirations of clubs like Everton/Villa as even with new investment it could not be utilised. This policy I presume is designed to address this.
 
Shirley said:
No offence intended here Frank, are you training to be some kind of a counselor?
Click to expand...

No offence taken. No sadly not, but it would probably be more rewarding than my current job. Although it does require a certain degree of 'lively debate'. Did you think the agenda thread, and my contribution, was part of my 'live' training?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.