Haha, yes, I noticed that Mangala was given 7/10. I've realised now that it is just laziness on behalf of the Independent/'i' - the report in 'i' is basically the first 5 paragraphs from the report in the full version of the paper, but the full report then goes on to actually describe the match (including some of City's participation!). SO in other words, they couldn't be arsed to write a short report just for 'i' that would make sense and describe the full game, they just used the first half of the full report.