I'm the first to slang the media off, BBC this morning started the sports section with gymnastics we were the throwaway mention right at the end.
Local BBC news just as I got home frJoe m the match last night made me laugh, the guy said there'd been traffic chaos earlier, we'd won and that the rags were doing there bit to ease traffic congestion by still playing.
6.30 general BBC news, mentioned United losing, Liverpool winning, showed the goals, gymnastics, etc, If I hadn't been at the match wouldn't have known we played. Just mentioned on the local news later. I could understand it if we were further down, but top of the table in the league and 5 -1 result, it really is poor media coverage
The mail seems very even handed in their headlines as of posting, the below is our current headline.
"Unstoppable City take season tally to 38 as teen Iheanacho leads five-goal romp to put Pellegrini's men on course for cup glory"
That's not the report from the paper, that's the online report. The write up in the paper was half about trying to find negatives than praising us for battering Palace, not to mention that the last 4 goals got about 2 sentences between them. It was about as negative as a report of a crushing 5-1 victory could be imo.
That's not the report from the paper, that's the online report. The write up in the paper was half about trying to find negatives than praising us for battering Palace, not to mention that the last 4 goals got about 2 sentences between them. It was about as negative as a report of a crushing 5-1 victory could be imo.
That wanker Chris Bevan on the BBC. 19.43 on commentary with headline "empty seats at the Etihad" same last week against Sevilla. This twat is clearly a rag who is as blatant as they come yet the bbc continue to publish his shite.