Media bias against City

Status
Not open for further replies.
BBC Football live stream - Snubstitution.... Hopeless typo or snidey bias (sniggers)

SNUBSTITUTION

Juventus 1-0 Man City

Posted at21:21
Problems here for City now as Joe Hart has to come off. Looked like he opened up his groin in making that fine save from Alvaro Morata a moment or so again. Willy Caballero is on, Hart goes straight down the tunnel.

you hadnt read the previous posts throughout the evening about where snubstitution came from then..... though i think you might be causing trouble ;)
 
you hadnt read the previous posts throughout the evening about where snubstitution came from then..... though i think you might be causing trouble ;)
He's done his mate Wazza a favour. The media are more concerned about Hart than talking about another Shrek no show last night.
 
Picture of our academy with it.

England's top clubs in new move to protect rising stars after fury at academy poaching

  • There's growing resentment among some of country’s most powerful clubs
  • Premier League asked to introduce reforms to stop ‘sharp practice’ culture
  • Sportsmail understands there's friction between both the Manchester clubs
  • New regulations will crack down on presence of agents in academy football


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3334247/England-s-clubs-new-protect-rising-stars-fury-poaching-academies.html#ixzz3sZtfNALv
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Ive just read the article - and it's not anti-City at all.
 
The boot is clearly on the other foot, or in our case on both feet, and MANUre, who for years drafted in the Classes of Whatever Year You Want to Name, are finding a bit of competition and they don't like it up 'em. Tells the whole story when Rag players choose our Academy!!
 
All these reports about Guardiola and Messi are just so the papers can write City snubbed Shirley?

I'll only believe these rumours come next summer and seeing the news on the OS.
 
Ive just read the article - and it's not anti-City at all.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...rs-fury-poaching-academies.html#ixzz3sZtfNALv

So basically Utd and Liverpool have complained so the premier league have done as they are told. The article has a few veiled swipes at us I think.

This rule will help the local lads at city who will have to be developed. However probably for another thread but not allowing players to move is an infringement of human rights. Kids should play where they are happy not be tied to club till the are 26 (Clubs can hold registrations that long). There are all sorts of reasons kids / families want to move.

Small clubs should have there investment protected for the good of football but this is about Utd and Liverpool bleating because there is a bigger boy in the playground and they cant / wont / cant be arsed / are to tight to compete on a fair playing field. The want the rules which always suited them in the past changing to suit them again in the new order- twats.

Like any business the big boys should take it on the chin if a player wants to move - regardless of investment. Thats the gamble any business takes.
 
I thought the BT commentary on Weds was a bit painful. Less than 30 seconds before they mentioned Scum winning in Turin. Lost count of how many times he mentioned us being hammered by the Dippers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.