Media bias against City

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mikejl said:
BBC Football live stream - Snubstitution.... Hopeless typo or snidey bias (sniggers)

SNUBSTITUTION

Juventus 1-0 Man City

Posted at21:21
Problems here for City now as Joe Hart has to come off. Looked like he opened up his groin in making that fine save from Alvaro Morata a moment or so again. Willy Caballero is on, Hart goes straight down the tunnel.
Click to expand...

you hadnt read the previous posts throughout the evening about where snubstitution came from then..... though i think you might be causing trouble ;)
 
shemnel said:
you hadnt read the previous posts throughout the evening about where snubstitution came from then..... though i think you might be causing trouble ;)
Click to expand...
He's done his mate Wazza a favour. The media are more concerned about Hart than talking about another Shrek no show last night.
 
mancity dan said:
Picture of our academy with it.

England's top clubs in new move to protect rising stars after fury at academy poaching
  • There's growing resentment among some of country’s most powerful clubs
  • Premier League asked to introduce reforms to stop ‘sharp practice’ culture
  • Sportsmail understands there's friction between both the Manchester clubs
  • New regulations will crack down on presence of agents in academy football


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3334247/England-s-clubs-new-protect-rising-stars-fury-poaching-academies.html#ixzz3sZtfNALv
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Click to expand...

Ive just read the article - and it's not anti-City at all.
 
The boot is clearly on the other foot, or in our case on both feet, and MANUre, who for years drafted in the Classes of Whatever Year You Want to Name, are finding a bit of competition and they don't like it up 'em. Tells the whole story when Rag players choose our Academy!!
 
All these reports about Guardiola and Messi are just so the papers can write City snubbed Shirley?

I'll only believe these rumours come next summer and seeing the news on the OS.
 
Blue&whitestripes said:
Ive just read the article - and it's not anti-City at all.
Click to expand...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...rs-fury-poaching-academies.html#ixzz3sZtfNALv

So basically Utd and Liverpool have complained so the premier league have done as they are told. The article has a few veiled swipes at us I think.

This rule will help the local lads at city who will have to be developed. However probably for another thread but not allowing players to move is an infringement of human rights. Kids should play where they are happy not be tied to club till the are 26 (Clubs can hold registrations that long). There are all sorts of reasons kids / families want to move.

Small clubs should have there investment protected for the good of football but this is about Utd and Liverpool bleating because there is a bigger boy in the playground and they cant / wont / cant be arsed / are to tight to compete on a fair playing field. The want the rules which always suited them in the past changing to suit them again in the new order- twats.

Like any business the big boys should take it on the chin if a player wants to move - regardless of investment. Thats the gamble any business takes.
 
I thought the BT commentary on Weds was a bit painful. Less than 30 seconds before they mentioned Scum winning in Turin. Lost count of how many times he mentioned us being hammered by the Dippers.
 
In their haste to take the piss, taken from the sun on the BBC gossip column.

".......Manchester City are willing to pay Lionel Messi £800k a week to lure him to the Emirates........"
 
Shirley said:
In their haste to take the piss, taken from the sun on the BBC gossip column.

".......Manchester City are willing to pay Lionel Messi £800k a week to lure him to the Emirates........"
Click to expand...

Did it really say that?! Truly inept!

There's some fast correcting been done though
 
MillionMilesAway said:
Did it really say that?! Truly inept!

There's some fast correcting been done though
Click to expand...

It's true! I was reading it as it changed to Etihad before my eyes. Very Harry Potter, I even refreshed the page it see if it was a joke item that started as one thing then changed. Would have had more respect for them if it had been...
 
Uwe Already said:
It's true! I was reading it as it changed to Etihad before my eyes. Very Harry Potter, I even refreshed the page it see if it was a joke item that started as one thing then changed. Would have had more respect for them if it had been...
Click to expand...

Thanks for posting that mate, I've been thinking should I have gone to specsavers for the last few hours!!
 
typical rag on the caf said:
I will honestly stop watching football for the length of his tenure at City (if he goes there), because they will dominate the league while we fade away under dismal management.
Click to expand...

That is a genuine quote from a rag on the caf. They live up to every single stereotype of your average glory hunting rag.
 
This morning's DT sports section starts with the tennis, naturally. Four pages. From Page 5 to the end - Leicester, Dippers, CFC, MANUre, Spurs, Leicester again, Dippers, EFC. Every team gets a mention including MCFC - but only in the context of Spurs 4 MCFC 1! Whole page spreads for Spurs, Leicester, Stoke, and we get a wee mention in the Guardiola story! That is not bias - it is blatantly ignoring one of the most exciting teams, and 'newsworthy' teams in the game! Wonder why?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top