Media bias against City

Status
Not open for further replies.
This was the first thought that entered my mind on reading it.
The blatant misrepresentation of City fans' motives notwithstanding, it is embarrassing that such sub-standard use of the language (he had from the leak on Wednesday to going to press yesterday to formulate the article) should be financially rewarded.
And compared to most, very well rewarded.
 
Here's Tim Rich in the Independent, writing about the new badge:


Would he use the term "plundered Russian state assets" to describe Chelsea? Or the phrase "swept away on a tide of Jewish debt" to describe the rags? Would he fuck.

The independent is getting out of hand now - this following hot on the heels of Mark Ogdens "10 reasons Pep should not go to man city now they've lost to arsenal"

Also, "avalanche of oil money", Arab or otherwise, is such an utterly wank metaphor.

Agreed, surely it would be more of a tidal wave?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.