gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
This is undoubtedly true and doesn't help the cause tbh.I'm saying that there's some soft as fuck people getting all upset about shit that isn't worth getting upset about, like the use of a word.
This is undoubtedly true and doesn't help the cause tbh.I'm saying that there's some soft as fuck people getting all upset about shit that isn't worth getting upset about, like the use of a word.
And compared to most, very well rewarded.This was the first thought that entered my mind on reading it.
The blatant misrepresentation of City fans' motives notwithstanding, it is embarrassing that such sub-standard use of the language (he had from the leak on Wednesday to going to press yesterday to formulate the article) should be financially rewarded.
Read the thread ballbag.We did. Just saying.#Oh I get you now, you're upset that we got humiliated and someone else got beat. Do people keep tabs on the words used? Soft strikes again.
Well it is my name. Not sure if I'm laughing at you or with you.Read the thread ballbag.
Ha ha just having a quiet chuckle to oneself at calling you a ballbag.
Ballbag.
Read the thread ballbag.
Ha ha just having a quiet chuckle to oneself at calling you a ballbag.
Ballbag.
Here they all come! Stony laird, keep it real.You should see the prick he hangs around with.
Here's Tim Rich in the Independent, writing about the new badge:
Would he use the term "plundered Russian state assets" to describe Chelsea? Or the phrase "swept away on a tide of Jewish debt" to describe the rags? Would he fuck.
Also, "avalanche of oil money", Arab or otherwise, is such an utterly wank metaphor.
Here they all come! Stony laird, keep it real.
You know it, laird xHaha, Joycee?
You know it, laird x