Media bias against City

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because Ferguson's style was confrontational and ours is not. Our guys run with the grain, it is not their style to do otherwise.

Hearts and minds? We do all the conventional stuff and more, we invite the world and his dog to see the marvel we're creating on the field and in the area of East Manchester, but grudging praise is the most we get. There are decades of bias and prejudice against us, our guys know this, they'll keep doing the right thing and one day it'll turn, that's their plan it would seem.

I'm not happy about it, but the Sheikh's not for turning.
I would not expect the sheikh to intervene in any media matters, that's just impractical!! that's why he employs people such as the city media department to put into practice, press management strategies. If our media department are unable to turn the tide after so many years, maybe the sheikh needs to review his deployment and their department's approach. Just look at United's media team they are amazing compared to ours and have the influence to nudge their agenda into the popular press. If our strategy is to do nothing overt that is fine and acceptable. But, there are strategies and influence we can do covertly to which I have no idea if our media team is capable of doing. To just say, our owner likes things conservative and our attempts at pushing our narrative has not worked well because of this - is a cop out. I think we need a new approach with new people and new thinking to deliver improved exposure. As a city fan, I've never seen it so bad. It is now acceptable to call us snakes, mercenaries, Death Star, vulgar Arab owner oil team and FFP cheats in the national press. We are having to read this type of dross almost daily and it is just tiresome for many fans to happily follow their team in the press / media.

Many of us have stopped listening to the sports radio, clicking on web sites, reading certain papers, mute certain TV pundits and avoid the bias build up to big games.

So, to illustrate pictures of our owners with powerful men and to stress their cultural conservatism is the reason city do nothing - does not sweeten my tolerance.
 
I would not expect the sheikh to intervene in any media matters, that's just impractical!! that's why he employs people such as the city media department to put into practice, press management strategies. If our media department are unable to turn the tide after so many years, maybe the sheikh needs to review his deployment and their department's approach. Just look at United's media team they are amazing compared to ours and have the influence to nudge their agenda into the popular press. If our strategy is to do nothing overt that is fine and acceptable. But, there are strategies and influence we can do covertly to which I have no idea if our media team is capable of doing. To just say, our owner likes things conservative and our attempts at pushing our narrative has not worked well because of this - is a cop out. I think we need a new approach with new people and new thinking to deliver improved exposure. As a city fan, I've never seen it so bad. It is now acceptable to call us snakes, mercenaries, Death Star, vulgar Arab owner oil team and FFP cheats in the national press. We are having to read this type of dross almost daily and it is just tiresome for many fans to happily follow their team in the press / media.

Many of us have stopped listening to the sports radio, clicking on web sites, reading certain papers, mute certain TV pundits and avoid the bias build up to big games.

So, to illustrate pictures of our owners with powerful men and to stress their cultural conservatism is the reason city do nothing - does not sweeten my tolerance.

I agree with much of what you say and undoubtedly it has got a lot worse recently, I do all the avoidance stuff you do, commentary, the press, radio and TV across the board it has all got much more vitriolic. Maybe it's because we might well be on to win our third EPL title in five years and with Utd in a tail spin and Leicester as a handy plucky outsider as an easy counter to oil rich City, the lazy fuckers in the media have just cranked up the prejudice.

I don't think the competence of the media team is the problem, they march to what ever tune the management strikes up, I can only assume that avoiding confrontation is club policy, I can see no other reason for it.
 
I agree with much of what you say and undoubtedly it has got a lot worse recently, I do all the avoidance stuff you do, commentary, the press, radio and TV across the board it has all got much more vitriolic. Maybe it's because we might well be on to win our third EPL title in five years and with Utd in a tail spin and Leicester as a handy plucky outsider as an easy counter to oil rich City, the lazy fuckers in the media have just cranked up the prejudice.

I don't think the competence of the media team is the problem, they march to what ever tune the management strikes up, I can only assume that avoiding confrontation is club policy, I can see no other reason for it.

We will have the last laugh. I'm sure that's the view of the club.
 
Something that may have slipped past many is the Neymar stuff. To give our press office credit they made sure every paper knew that we were not in for him on any level.
No way were we going to be used as Utd do to help get a new improved contract. It was rather obvious in the papers that the press had been made very aware we have no interest atm.
 
Something that may have slipped past many is the Neymar stuff. To give our press office credit they made sure every paper knew that we were not in for him on any level.
No way were we going to be used as Utd do to help get a new improved contract. It was rather obvious in the papers that the press had been made very aware we have no interest atm.
They do a few things well and good work - nice example of correcting an obvious tale born out of mischief making for an improved contract. But we knew that all along didn't we? Can you now correct the Death Star analogy and the snake references to sterling. Oh and whilst we are at it, correct his purchase price ;)
 
Maybe it's because I find Star Wars a boring, childish fairy tale but I'm really not as upset about the Death Star reference as others seem to be.
Star Wars is in vogue right now and a writer used a topical reference to describe the difference in muscle power between the two clubs.
I wouldn't take it too literally. No more so than I'd believe we were being called animals, had we been described as ewoks.
 
Maybe it's because I find Star Wars a boring, childish fairy tale but I'm really not as upset about the Death Star reference as others seem to be.
Star Wars is in vogue right now and a writer used a topical reference to describe the difference in muscle power between the two clubs.
I wouldn't take it too literally. No more so than I'd believe we were being called animals, had we been described as ewoks.
Fair point, ewok is equally as ridiculous ;)
 
I must admit, I do get sick of the press bias. But then as the press is biased anyway, not just about football, I rarely bother to read it. TV commentators are mostly wankers, but it does get a bit tedious. City probably do need to do more on the PR side, but I can see it's going to be an uphill battle, as most of the good stuff the Club already does (and traditionally have done, for many years) gets completely ignored. Short of Sheikh Mansour buying a newspaper and a TV company, I doubt even the best PR machine will change things overnight. We are just too easy a target for lazy 'journalists' and so-called pundits, most of whom are bears of small brain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.