Media bias against City

[Manchester_lalala]

The marketing would be immense for a bin dipper derby final.

It would be all about 80's with parallels to their great teams of that era. References to 86 etc. An excuse to dig up Rush,Nicol,Grobbalar, Reid,Sharp and Sheedy.

A wank wall presentation promoting "The friendly Derby" with opposing dippers sharing their renowned Scouse humour and maybe a subtle hillsborugh reference thrown in to boot.

Your bang on point there, got it nailed down to a tee. If we get to the final, I still expect an all dipper punditry line up on sky.

 

[RyanP3609]

Looks like the press are selling Sergio to Real Madrid but there's no bias....

With Serg being the usual name they link with Real every fucking window it's no surprise. I'd be really shocked if they didn't bid on him this window with everything going on in terms of their forthcoming transfer ban. They'll have no doubt put the feelers out for loads of players (Hazard comes to mind also). The thing is though, we're not a selling club, nor are we wanting to sell our best players. So we'd firmly tell them to piss off. And given their circumstances we'd be looking (if we wanted to sell him which we don't) at the very least 80million. Hardly anyone is sold mid-season but now they'll have to bid for them cos there dodgy cunts.

Rather than doing there fucking job the lazy hacks must just play random name/club link, or just read through their old stories so they can do the same articles again and again. Hence why whenever the scum get a poor result you see "Bale/Tranny to sign for the scum...". The ban is going to mean they'll have to think of some new players to link to the scum for a change!

 

[crazyg]

Remind me again. Who is loaning Real Madrid the money for their new stadium?

Would they really try to bite the hand that feeds them?

 

[dom]

Some tiny stuff for the press

Real are hit with a transfer ban
Where have they actually named Sergio as a target?
Sergio has already pledged his short term future to City
Sergio, as an ex Altico player would be unlikely to favour Real

 

[dario2739]

Looking at the MUEN earlier - Banner on cover stating that Real Madrid's transfer ban means that they wouldn't be able to sign De Gea... the at the back an article that Real Madrid's transfer ban could mean they'd (try to) sign Sergio... so how does that fucking work then?

 

[Bill]

Looking at the MUEN earlier - Banner on cover stating that Real Madrid's transfer ban means that they wouldn't be able to sign De Gea... the at the back an article that Real Madrid's transfer ban could mean they'd (try to) sign Sergio... so how does that fucking work then?

well for a start is a rag rag. hope this helps.

 

[mac]

Remind me again. Who is loaning Real Madrid the money for their new stadium?

Would they really try to bite the hand that feeds them?

Exactly. Over he last month I have been trying to tell many fans ( rags as well and all cockneys) that footy has changed forever. We will be the biggest but also the days of a team that dominates are long gone. I as a City fan I want this challenge.

 

[mat]

Simon Taylor a journo on Talkshite last night was calling sagna a bitter cry baby for having a go at refs. Really irked me.

 

[moenchengladbach blau]

Simon Taylor a journo on Talkshite last night was calling sagna a bitter cry baby for having a go at refs. Really irked me.

Amazing how little they have to say when a mob of snarling rags surround the ref.

Some clunt in the DT reported the Bacary remarks using words life 'claimed' and 'alleged' about the incidents. Far stronger words would have been used if the rags ever got such decisions go against them.

 

[Feed the Elk]

A foul inside the penalty area - in this case "tripping or attempting to trip an opponent" results in a penalty kick.
It matters not a jot in which direction the attacking player is travelling, nor which part of the penalty area the foul occurs,if the foul occurs , it is a penalty.
An indirect free kick will be awarded, in the penalty area to an attacker on the grounds of obstruction.
There was no obstruction committed.
We could have been 7-0 up - a penalty is a penalty , it doesn't matter what the score is. We wouldn't have relied on it , it should simply have been awarded because that would have been the correct course of action.

Not sure you understood my point