Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
Driving around dipper land on Monday, couldn't bring myself to listen to their local radio, saw it was near top of the hour so put Gmr on for sports news and that Chelsea was on talking to a youngster who supports Arsenal, she asked him about the game on Sunday v rags,she then said all of Manchester was upset with the score, pulled the plug there and then. Brazil this morning that fuckwit Jim White comes on to plug his shit slot and inform what he would be boring people with and he was getting very excited about Juve and the tranny, then it's a feature on poor old Bolton so no mention of our our game, plug well and truly pulled.
Have you ever tried listening to your favourite music? It's much easier.
 
You know it probably is but after such a fab game I wanna hear as much about it as possible. You then have snidey ****s like Jim Shite and Simon Frankenstein Jordan who ignore our wins but lose or any negativity and they're all over it like a rash.
 
They way they ignore our wins after a 7-0 , wouldn't be surprised if we win the quadruple and the media would like dippers nearly won the league

Would actually prefer we are under the radar till he very end
 
To quote Gary Neville........No,No,No....said about eight times.
I wonder what Gary thinks constitutes high feet? Or dangerous play? Do you actually have to sevre the jugular artery in the neck ?
I actually believe that it was Neville and Tyler that set the tone for.the media that night. If they had both agreed it was a red card when commentating then.all of the crap that followed from media at al would never had happened
 
I'm watching the Bayern v Vermin game, and the shithouse of a commentator took his tongue out of Pointys arse to inform the viewing millions that Chelsea were the last English team to beat Bayern in the Chumps league, totally igoring our 2014 victory. Nothing about Sergios magical hatrick on a famous night in Manchester.. no, FUCK ALL!! For an organisation to get that wrong is criminal..but they didn't; because they wouldn't! It's properganda at it's sly worst. They just don't want to make it look like we've got any history, and saying positive things about years gone by might look bad on their beloved dippers and Rag baatards. Absolutely shocking. C##NTS
 
I'm watching the Bayern v Vermin game, and the shithouse of a commentator took his tongue out of Pointys arse to inform the viewing millions that Chelsea were the last English team to beat Bayern in the Chumps league, totally igoring our 2014 victory. Nothing about Sergios magical hatrick on a famous night in Manchester.. no, FUCK ALL!! For an organisation to get that wrong is criminal..but they didn't; because they wouldn't! It's properganda at it's sly worst. They just don't want to make it look like we've got any history, and saying positive things about years gone by might look bad on their beloved dippers and Rag baatards. Absolutely shocking. C##NTS

He did mention being beaten at their place and Chelsea beat them in 2012
We beat them 2- 3 on 10th December 2013 at the Allianz, the night Pellegrini couldn’t add up. He conveniently forgot that.
 
I have just bothered to send this to the BBC complaints department and have asked for a reply. Undoubtedly some Rag will be back at me telling me this is not the case and they are fair and balanced.

Every year I pay my BBC television license based on the fact that it is for a publicly funded 'neutral' news, sports and entertainment company. The bitter, biased nature of the company's sports reporting is both clear and consistent, and that is the BBC allows its so called sports reporters to portray Manchester City Football Club in such a negative way it is utterly disgraceful. It is clear most of them have very strong allegiances to other football clubs and seem hellbent on painting Manchester City in a bad light. Year on year Manchester City has been the subject of many negative articles, reports and social media postings by employees of the BBC seemingly without fear of censure or retribution from the 'neutral' company they are employed by. This is without doubt unacceptable and must be addressed by a company who is funded by the public to deliver unbiased reporting and entertainment and not some propaganda machine used to slant the truth and show bias towards a direct competitor of the reporters chosen team. The uneven reporting of Manchester City in relation to some of the other teams competing in the Premier League and high level cup competitions is in a word despicable. It is clear from the manner of most of your articles, reports and tweets that the author has an affiliation with a rival of Manchester City and seems to have the power to distort the truth and facts to suit there own biased agenda without retribution. This must come to an end as it is both unfair and totally against everything the BBC is supposed to stand for. Please address this as a matter of urgency as it has been going on before the company moved to Salford but since then it has got increasingly worse. Just a fair and neutral view of Manchester City football club is all I ask for but for more years than I can remember the BBC has allowed some of it's employees to treat them is anything but.

Feel like I'm pissing into last nights wind but I saw someone had posted a link and felt I should at least try. I await their reply with an already deep sense of disappointment in their findings but thought I'd do it just the same.


It’s a bit wordy probably best to just call them peado hiding cnuts
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.