Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Manchester City have been wobbling"

"City's nerves were soothed as Agueto scored another tap in...And a big hand in his hat trick. Arsenal protested whilst Sergio celebrated" - Both BBC News at Ten


"Hand of God hat trick from Sergio Aguero" - Sky News



Lots of credit there....
 
mat said:
"Manchester City have been wobbling"

"City's nerves were soothed as Agueto scored another tap in...And a big hand in his hat trick. Arsenal protested whilst Sergio celebrated" - Both BBC News at Ten


"Hand of God hat trick from Sergio Aguero" - Sky News



Lots of credit there....
Click to expand...
They are always giving us our due credit
 
gavvo said:
Every commentator, every time we score, sounds like they have just realised they have stepped in dog poo.
Click to expand...
Best example..tyler at anfield when silva equalised in front of the kop..the hillsborough anniversary match...he just went quiet,then mumbled something.
 
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
My lad tells me that the PL have confirmed that had VAR operated Sergio's third wouldn't have stood. What have they confirmed about Salah's diving?
Click to expand...
Have they also confirmed that we would have had a penalty, or that wolves equalising goal earlier in the season would not have stood? or are their confirmation statements only aimed against us.If the ball hits a defenders hand like Kuns today it would not be a penalty as the keeper deflected it onto him from two yards away as he is sliding in.Fortunate, yes, handball? no.
 
Blue_eyes said:
Have they also confirmed that we would have had a penalty, or that wolves equalising goal earlier in the season would not have stood? or are their confirmation statements only aimed against us.If the ball hits a defenders hand like Kuns today it would not be a penalty as the keeper deflected it onto him from two yards away as he is sliding in.Fortunate, yes, handball? no.
Click to expand...

I want to see their video evidence, that it did hit his arm.
 
prestonibbo_mcfc said:
I want to see their video evidence, that it did hit his arm.
Click to expand...
I only saw it on tv, but there was no intent and I think its more that a funny spin on the ball takes it into the net. Just as an aside, we only seem to get any kind of break when it doesnt change anything,and still it gets blown up by the media etc, we could do with a couple to actually win a game, then we would see how the wnkers moan.
 
Blue_eyes said:
Have they also confirmed that we would have had a penalty, or that wolves equalising goal earlier in the season would not have stood? or are their confirmation statements only aimed against us.If the ball hits a defenders hand like Kuns today it would not be a penalty as the keeper deflected it onto him from two yards away as he is sliding in.Fortunate, yes, handball? no.
Click to expand...
Spot on,strange thing is the front camera view it looks like it hits his arm/ elbow the rear camera view hits him on the side of his body and rolls past his arm without touching well that’s how I seen it ..
 
mat said:
"Manchester City have been wobbling"

"City's nerves were soothed as Agueto scored another tap in...And a big hand in his hat trick. Arsenal protested whilst Sergio celebrated" - Both BBC News at Ten


"Hand of God hat trick from Sergio Aguero" - Sky News



Lots of credit there....
Click to expand...

It’s nonsense though, isn’t it. You can pick a few choice quotes and bemoan the media but if you look at tomorrow’s back pages they’re all actually pretty complimentary about us. I’m sure we never used to be so self-pitying.







 
Perhaps I'm being stupid but it would not be the Premier League that would disallow Aguero's goal with VAR would it? So why seek comment from them?

My mate Burt from Stockport said it would absolutely be allowed under VAR is just as relevant
 
i back page headline:
"Aguero admits hat-trick goal went in off his hand"

Front page trail headline:
"Aguero lends a hand to keep City in title hunt"

Report headline:
"Pressure on Liverpool as handy Aguero sinks Arsenal"

First line is the head/right foot/left hand line.
 
mrbelfry said:
Perhaps I'm being stupid but it would not be the Premier League that would disallow Aguero's goal with VAR would it? So why seek comment from them?

My mate Burt from Stockport said it would absolutely be allowed under VAR is just as relevant
Click to expand...
Burt is always my first go too on controversial de
mrbelfry said:
Perhaps I'm being stupid but it would not be the Premier League that would disallow Aguero's goal with VAR would it? So why seek comment from them?

My mate Burt from Stockport said it would absolutely be allowed under VAR is just as relevant
Click to expand...
Burt can always be relied upon to give a honest opinion on the weekends events ; )
 
Blue_eyes said:
Have they also confirmed that we would have had a penalty, or that wolves equalising goal earlier in the season would not have stood? or are their confirmation statements only aimed against us.If the ball hits a defenders hand like Kuns today it would not be a penalty as the keeper deflected it onto him from two yards away as he is sliding in.Fortunate, yes, handball? no.
Click to expand...

My son raised the same point re Sergio's goal and the PL confirmtion of Var disallowal - he raises the goal Millwall scored in the FArce Cup! Selective use of selected incidents. No a fuckin' dicky about the Wolves goal, our pens (plural)! Typical of the sewage that spews out of these media and governing body outlets!
 
prestonibbo_mcfc said:
I want to see their video evidence, that it did hit his arm.
Click to expand...
Completely agree, hits his side and goes in. Might of brushed his arm on the way past, might and even if did no intention. Perfectly good goal and if PL claiming VAR would have disallowed it, then the game is up as VAR will end up being more contentious than a poor referee.
 
Ric said:
It’s nonsense though, isn’t it. You can pick a few choice quotes and bemoan the media but if you look at tomorrow’s back pages they’re all actually pretty complimentary about us. I’m sure we never used to be so self-pitying.

You see us as self-pitying I just see it as honest debate as we don't often get a lot of credit for our achievements.
Click to expand...
 
Ric said:
It’s nonsense though, isn’t it. You can pick a few choice quotes and bemoan the media but if you look at tomorrow’s back pages they’re all actually pretty complimentary about us. I’m sure we never used to be so self-pitying.







Click to expand...


It's almost like people on see what they want to see...it was forever thus!
 
Robanompivenov said:
It's almost like people on see what they want to see...it was forever thus!
Click to expand...

So there is no bias then?, Editor's blameless? Everything in the media kosher? Phew, what a relief. Shame on us remainers who support City and detest right-wing politicians/supporters. Because some of us may stretch evidence a little does not mean the entire premise of media bias is bogus. Media bias created brexit, carries it, keeps it stampeding to the cliff and over the edge. With nothing more than rumour and lies.
The sky/rags/diaper bias is entirely money driven, subscriptions/shirts/ad-revenue add up to billions, who or what threatens that is firmly in the firing line
 
bellbuzzer said:
So there is no bias then?, Editor's blameless? Everything in the media kosher? Phew, what a relief. Shame on us remainers who support City and detest right-wing politicians/supporters. Because some of us may stretch evidence a little does not mean the entire premise of media bias is bogus. Media bias created brexit, carries it, keeps it stampeding to the cliff and over the edge. With nothing more than rumour and lies.
The sky/rags/diaper bias is entirely money driven, subscriptions/shirts/ad-revenue add up to billions, who or what threatens that is firmly in the firing line
Click to expand...

You've created a bit of nay-sayer tumbleweed there mate. Top work Blue!!!
 
bellbuzzer said:
So there is no bias then?, Editor's blameless? Everything in the media kosher? Phew, what a relief. Shame on us remainers who support City and detest right-wing politicians/supporters. Because some of us may stretch evidence a little does not mean the entire premise of media bias is bogus. Media bias created brexit, carries it, keeps it stampeding to the cliff and over the edge. With nothing more than rumour and lies.
The sky/rags/diaper bias is entirely money driven, subscriptions/shirts/ad-revenue add up to billions, who or what threatens that is firmly in the firing line
Click to expand...
Drivel.

The BBC a publicly funded body spend their every waking moment pushing project fear
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top